Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seems you are starting to understand why the Supreme Court is going to take this case. We don't ignore the laws of the country because it will make a few people upset.
Real people. Real live people. And not just a few. Hundreds of thousands.
Let's devastate them financially. That'll surely help the Republican Party win elections. Not.
No, they were screwed by Obamacare, just like the people who were promised they could keep their insurance plans and/or doctors were screwed.
Evidently they were more screwed than people who lived in states that did set up exchanges. And the conservatives want to tighten those screws. Because that's how you win elections! Ooops, not so much.
No, they were screwed by Obamacare, just like the people who were promised they could keep their insurance plans and/or doctors were screwed.
No they were screwed by the GOP - who FIRST refused to set up a state exchange in their states AND THEN took away the Federal subsidies as well so that THEIR CONSTITUENTS can't get subsidies while folks in blue states that set up exchanges CAN.
Oh yeah, that's a real winning plan for the GOP.
Once again, the conservatives pressing the lawsuit are brilliant. Hurt hundreds of thousands of people to prove a point. Yeah, that'll be a winning strategy at the polls.
The long standing laws of this country is kinda, sorta, pretty important wouldn't you say?
Seriously though, I can't take your post seriously. I can only chuckle at the defense that we should ignore illegal actions by an administration because otherwise some people will be upset.
Evidently they were more screwed than people who lived in states that did set up exchanges. And the conservatives want to tighten those screws.
The Republicans have nothing to do with it. The Dems wrote and passed the ACA which very clearly prohibits those who purchase insurance on the federal exchange from receiving subsidies.
Had subsidies according to who? The ACA doesn't allow subsidies to be given to those who purchase insurance on the federal exchange.
They had subsidies ACCORDING TO THEIR POCKETBOOKS.
If you take money away from people that's ALL they will care about.
Do you REALLY think folks will THANK YOU for making them pay more for insurance than the folks in other states pay?
Ken
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
