Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well. If it wasn't for that pesky government data clearly showing the red states as moochers and blue states as providers I could actually believe you...
I'm not disputing the data, I just proved to you that blue voters in red states are more likely to consume social services money and you conveniently ignored it. It doesn't matter what you believe or not, it's a fact whether you like it or not.
Would it make you happy if I sent you a photo of a blue voter here in my red state that you're supporting? We could do the whole "For just $8 a day you too can support your own worthless Democrat" Sally Struthers type deal.
It is not just that the red states are a detriment to this society regarding tax dollars, it is the ENTIRE IDEOLOGY of the red states that has ALWAYS been a cancer on this society in every facet, every single category. This has nothing to do with "compassion and helping people".
You guys should move then, I'm sure there are tons of more liberal countries out there that would welcome a wannabe lawyer with a cracker jack box diploma who trolls web forums for a living.
I'm not disputing the data, I just proved to you that blue voters in red states are more likely to consume social services money and you conveniently ignored it. It doesn't matter what you believe or not, it's a fact whether you like it or not.
Would it make you happy if I sent you a photo of a blue voter here in my red state that you're supporting? We could do the whole "For just $8 a day you too can support your own worthless Democrat" Sally Struthers type deal.
And yet the states where democrats statistically outnumber republicans are more affluent and contribute to society while the states where republicans outnumber democrats are moochers and include such economical and educational disasters like Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana.
Given the examples of ultra-conservative states like Mississippi and Alabama one could say that the more republican or conservative the state is, the more likely it is to be a dirt poor and totally reliant on federal assistance. The more conservative - the more useless...
It's not the conservative states that are the issue - it's the southern states.
With the exception of AK and OR, the southern (old slave) states are all using high levels of SNAP.
I love when Liberals use selective data to fulfill a delusional hypothesis.
I love it when they lose elections and attack each other over their massive failures. I'm really looking forward to these midterms, you can bet quite a few of our more famous members here will be missing for a while after Nov. Lexnuts will obviously need some consoling.
I love it when they lose elections and attack each other over their massive failures. I'm really looking forward to these midterms, you can bet quite a few of our more famous members here will be missing for a while after Nov. Lexnuts will obviously need some consoling.
They have already moved onto 2016, they are pretending like we are not having an election this year.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
