Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mia Love [Utah's new congresswoman for the Fourth District] cut to the chase Tuesday about what this growing conservative black movement is all about -- individualism over collectivism. In a post-election interview with CNN, Love was asked how her race and gender were a factor in her victory. She fired back:
"First of all, I think what we need to mention here is this had nothing to do with race," Love said. "Understand that Utahns have made a statement that they're not interested in dividing Americans based on race or gender, that they want to make sure that they're electing people who are honest and who have integrity . . ."
In other words, it was the content of Love's character that got her elected, not the color of her skin.
What a radical notion. Where have we heard that before?
I wonder if she thinks Mia Love and Tim Scott can have fried chicken too?
Hahaha! I love that people jumped on this as if she wasn't asked about Soul Food after voting. A joke which I am pretty sure was a fun jab at her healthy eating initiatives which she went along with and said you can have as a treat long as you get out and vote.
It means even Michelle Obama herself thinks the Black community is so dumb that they'll vote straight ticket for a party that has done NOTHING for them for DECADES.
Really? In what way do you think it used to be for black people but it isn't now? Who has policies which arebetter for black people?
Hillary...psshh, surprised dems are not trying to make this happen, Barack "the greatest president of all time" can still be at the whitehouse "repairing relationships around the world" like he's been doing now. and for another 8 years so he can continue fixing the greatest recession since the great depression that the previous administration caused.
That wasn't helpful. She agreed because her educational policy mirrors certain conservatives. When they mirrored a Democrat (Fenty) she was for Democrats. She'd be for the current mayor because she is one of those who agreed with Fenty in wanting the voucher program restarted in DC. In this case voting against a Democrat wouldn't have made sense as the policies coincided with her beliefs.
Hillary...psshh, surprised dems are not trying to make this happen, Barack "the greatest president of all time" can still be at the whitehouse "repairing relationships around the world" like he's been doing now. and for another 8 years so he can continue fixing the greatest recession since the great depression that the previous administration caused.
She's qualified too. just as Barack was
let's do this!
Oh I wish the libs would draft Moochelle (does she like to golf too?). Hey 53% of voters are stupid so she might very well win.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
