The Charlie Hebdo attack was a strike against free speech. So why is the response more surveillance? (McCain, Feingold)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The terrorists want to control people through violence. Politicians want to control people through laws. When those laws don't work as we have seen, they will resort to violence also.
The terrorists want to control people through violence. Politicians want to control people through laws. When those laws don't work as we have seen, they will resort to violence also.
It doesn't explain the curtail of freedom and liberties, we have ?
The terrorists want to control people through violence. Politicians want to control people through laws. When those laws don't work as we have seen, they will resort to violence also.
The terrorists want to control people through violence. Politicians want to control people through laws. When those laws don't work as we have seen, they will resort to violence also.
That's not true, that's their jobs that we elect them to do. If you don't want to be controlled, then go to some place that isn't controlled.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
