Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2015, 11:08 AM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
For the Constitutionally ignorant who might be willing to make themselves a little less ignorant through taking in new (to them) information, the United States Supreme Court ruled long ago (1968, to be precise) allowed that government can prohibit commercial discrimination regardless of the religious excuse served up to justify that discrimination.

Maurice Bessinger owned BBQ restaurants in South Carolina. He refused to comply with laws prohibiting commercial discrimination based on race, asserting his religious right to do so. He was sued, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that he was compelled by law to serve customers regardless of race. When he then appealed to the USSC, the high court refused to grant cert, thereby allowing the Circuit Court ruling to become binding precedent.


http://www.forwardprogressives.com/sc-restaurant-owner-refuses-serve-blacks-cites-religious-beliefs/

He was avowedly pro-slavery, and distributed tracts to that effect to his customers - replete, of course, with Biblical citations to demonstrate that his beliefs and his refusal to serve blacks were religious.
http://www.thestate.com/news/business/article13839323.html

Now, before the bleating that sexual orientation is not race commences, that's not the issue - the issue is whether or not government can prohibit commercial discrimination against any class of people regardless of the treasured religious beliefs of the would-be discriminators. And the answer is an obvious and resounding YES.

Oh, and for those of you peddling the "But, when a business is opened before an anti-discrimination law is passed, that business shouldn't have to follow the law!" nonsense, Mr. Bessinger opened his first whites-only restaurant in 1953, over a decade before the Civil Rights Act - which required that he not turn away customers based on race - became law. Can we please get a show of hands from people who think that he should have been allowed to continue to be anti-black in his business practices? Anyone?

She did NOT discriminate against anyone. She openly and happily sells flowers to gay people. She declined to provide services in support of AN EVENT that was in celebration of Homosexuality. It would be no different than refusing to provide flowers to a KKK rally or a Planned Parenthood Fundraising event. THE EVENT is the object of the service, NOT the individuals.

 
Old 03-31-2015, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by loriinwa View Post
She did NOT discriminate against anyone. She openly and happily sells flowers to gay people. She declined to provide services in support of AN EVENT that was in celebration of Homosexuality. It would be no different than refusing to provide flowers to a KKK rally or a Planned Parenthood Fundraising event. THE EVENT is the object of the service, NOT the individuals.
Does she sell wedding flowers to other people?
If so then refusal to sell them to this couple is discrimination.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 11:22 AM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Does she sell wedding flowers to other people?
If so then refusal to sell them to this couple is discrimination.
You miss the point. Weddings are not a protected class. Thus, you cannot be accused of discrimination against a wedding.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by loriinwa View Post
You miss the point. Weddings are not a protected class. Thus, you cannot be accused of discrimination against a wedding.
But the people being refused service are in some states. None of the cases was about not wanting to do weddings at all, but about not wanting to do weddings for a specific couple, a gay couple.

A hot dog is not a protected class, but you can not refuse to sell a hot dog to a Jew and sell them to everyone else.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:14 PM
 
157 posts, read 96,784 times
Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by loriinwa View Post
You miss the point. Weddings are not a protected class. Thus, you cannot be accused of discrimination against a wedding.
You seem to be forgetting that weddings aren't people.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:34 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,594,283 times
Reputation: 16439
Quote:
Originally Posted by loriinwa View Post
You miss the point. Weddings are not a protected class. Thus, you cannot be accused of discrimination against a wedding.
So can she legally not sell flowers to interracial weddings?
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:37 PM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Does she sell wedding flowers to other people?
If so then refusal to sell them to this couple is discrimination.

She sells flowers to everyone. Including the this gay customer....for nearly a decade.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:38 PM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
But the people being refused service are in some states. None of the cases was about not wanting to do weddings at all, but about not wanting to do weddings for a specific couple, a gay couple.

A hot dog is not a protected class, but you can not refuse to sell a hot dog to a Jew and sell them to everyone else.

She didn't refuse to sell flowers to these people.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:39 PM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by roundtine View Post
You seem to be forgetting that weddings aren't people.
That IS the point. She did not discriminate against a person, she declined to participate in an EVENT.
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:40 PM
 
920 posts, read 634,226 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
So can she legally not sell flowers to interracial weddings?
There is no religious proscription regarding interracial marriages.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top