Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:42 PM
 
3,298 posts, read 2,474,646 times
Reputation: 5517

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by trishguard View Post
Christians aren't bound by the Old Testament. If we were, we'd be Jewish.
Christians do however cherry pick parts of the OT to follow and parts to ignore. As I stated.

 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Wallace, Idaho
3,352 posts, read 6,663,974 times
Reputation: 3590
Quote:
Originally Posted by budlight View Post
Two entirely different things. This guy is an employee of Costco. The other is running the business the way he wants to.
Not different at all. Both instances of people who think their religion overrides their professional obligations.

I knew somebody would try make excuses for one and condemn the other. So predictable.
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
Christians do however cherry pick parts of the OT to follow and parts to ignore. As I stated.
Christianity is the New Testament onward.
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:45 PM
 
3,298 posts, read 2,474,646 times
Reputation: 5517
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Christianity is the New Testament onward.
While noted, that is irrelevant to my observation.
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Christianity is the New Testament onward.
But they also follow the old testament. The only thing additional they believe in is the teachings of Jesus.
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Subconscious Syncope, USA (Northeastern US)
2,365 posts, read 2,149,295 times
Reputation: 3814
Its absurd.

He CANT do the job if he has an issue with touching any product in the store. Its his responsibility to know the products, and he should have known before he even applied that the store sold something he could not touch. How can he even take the job, with these personal restrictions?

The store/business shouldnt suffer because he has good reasons he CANT do the job. Im sure they wont have a problem finding someone that can.

Ive seen some cashiers, that looked 'delicate' about touching pork and some seafoods, wear gloves and usually bag it seperately always before including it with other groceries. They adjust in whatever way they feel is appropriate and acceptable, in order to be able to actually do the job.

If he cant adjust, hey, its not for him. *shrugs*
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:51 PM
 
3,762 posts, read 5,424,662 times
Reputation: 4833
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
But they also follow the old testament. The only thing additional they believe in is the teachings of Jesus.
Other than the 10 commandments, I don't. I don't follow any of their laws on food and whatnot. I'm not Jewish. Christians do study the old testament.
 
Old 03-09-2015, 05:53 PM
 
3,298 posts, read 2,474,646 times
Reputation: 5517
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConeyGirl52 View Post
Its absurd.

He CANT do the job if he has an issue with touching any product in the store. Its his responsibility to know the products, and he should have known before he even applied that the store sold something he could not touch. How can he even take the job, with these personal restrictions?
I don't see that as the case here. Federal law requires employers to 'reasonably accommodate' an employee's religious observances, practices and beliefs; unless the employer can demonstrate such accommodation would cause an "undue hardship" to the employer's business.

In this case, it appears Costco attempted to accommodate this Muslim employee's religion by assigning him other duties. There are certainly legal precedents; this one is from 2007:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/17665989/n.../#.VP4lI_nF8ng
 
Old 03-09-2015, 06:02 PM
 
Location: P.C.F
1,973 posts, read 2,274,892 times
Reputation: 1626
k:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbyman View Post
He was a tool and should be sued for workplace fraud.
Costco should sue his azz off!! Make him wish he haqd never left the f-ing desert!
 
Old 03-09-2015, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Subconscious Syncope, USA (Northeastern US)
2,365 posts, read 2,149,295 times
Reputation: 3814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch33 View Post
I don't see that as the case here. Federal law requires employers to 'reasonably accommodate' an employee's religious observances, practices and beliefs; unless the employer can demonstrate such accommodation would cause an "undue hardship" to the employer's business.

In this case, it appears Costco attempted to accommodate this Muslim employee's religion by assigning him other duties. There are certainly legal precedents; this one is from 2007:

Target shifts Muslims who won
Its a grocery store. If hes going to stock, he has to be able to stock everything. Has nothing to do with religous accomodation of observences, and everything to do with not disrupting the business. Those carts - sometimes those packages leak, you know.

He cant ever be a cashier, because he cant tolerate certain products the store sells. You never know when a ham or some pork chops, hotdogs, breakfast sausage, etc might come along. Same with unloading and stocking. You never know. Its like they have to also hire one totally non-religous guy to follow this guy around to touch the products he cant touch for him. Its absurd.

Islam teaches that pigs are unclean and eating pork is a sin, and some Muslims feel selling or handling pork is also forbidden because it would make them complicit in the sins of others.


If Target can reasonably accomodate them is one thing, and great for the company and employees. But if its such a sin, and selling and being amidst these products makes them complicit in the sins of others, why would they work for the company? Isnt it a sinful company, and arent they becoming complcit in the sins of said company by working for them, then?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top