Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is no precedent in contemporary weather records for the kinds of droughts the country's West will face, if greenhouse gas emissions stay on course, a NASA study said.
No precedent even in the past 1,000 years.
[MOD CUT/copyright violation]
But to hell with them...what do those liberal weenies know? They're only PhD scientists with some of the best scientific educations working for the organization that put a man on the moon. [MOD CUT/flaming]
Bury your heads in the sand! There's nothing to worry about!
Plenty of evidence that the arctic was a tropical region at one time. Antarctica is still 99% unexplored so maybe it was, also. So "record" doesn't mean too much considering nobody was there before a few decades ago.
And so rather than do something to help people cope with climate change liberals want to pass laws to try and stop it. Maybe instead of wasting years on 'carbon credits' you should have been working on an inexpensive desalination process, but no liberals would rather spend their time trying to control people to stop the unstoppable.
And so rather than do something to help people cope with climate change liberals want to pass laws to try and stop it. Maybe instead of wasting years on 'carbon credits' you should have been working on an inexpensive desalination process, but no liberals would rather spend their time trying to control people to stop the unstoppable.
Wow...this is amazing....let me try and compare this:
And so rather than do something to help people cope with lung cancer liberals want to pass laws to try and stop it. Maybe instead of wasting years on 'stop smoking campaigns' you should have been working on an inexpensive lung replacement process, but no liberals would rather spend their time trying to control people to stop the unstoppable.
It is not really a case of either/or, how about both? However to have this sort of nuanced discussion with folks who put their fingers in their ears and deny the basic physics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon
And so rather than do something to help people cope with climate change liberals want to pass laws to try and stop it. Maybe instead of wasting years on 'carbon credits' you should have been working on an inexpensive desalination process, but no liberals would rather spend their time trying to control people to stop the unstoppable.
"Scientists project that the Arctic will be ice-free in the summer of 2013." - John Kerry, 31 August, 2009
Oh look, we can take a quote from someone quoting a small minority of scientists....and make it sound like that was the prediction.
Actually the reality is that most scientists estimate a 2030-2060 time frame for it. I would suggest you dont try and take your understanding of science from those who aren't actually reputable scientists. And look at what the general consensus is instead of spouting nonsense like this.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
