Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is weird that you feel the need to tell others what sexual acts you do and don't do, but whatever....not really the point of this thread.
I don't mean its not one that i do, i mean its not one of the 'normal acts'. Teaching kids that it is normal or healthy sexual activity is unquestionably subversive.
You are a depraved person to promote teaching children about abnormal behavior like that. And anyone teaching it, I suspect their motives are perverse in themselves. No normal well balanced child is going to go 'oh, i feel like inserting my arm into this person who i like, I wonder what the proper way to do that is, i wish they would have covered that in sex ed.' You people are unbelievable in how far gone you are.
I do not have kids but may parents told me all about it and got me birth control.
I have a healthy dating life.
Right wings do not want kids to learn about birth control and STD.
Utter BS! Some parents whether they be left or right don't want to talk to their kids about sex but you haven't provided any proof that it is a right wing thing only nor that it represents the majority of them. I am a conservative and I talked to my teenagers about sex and yes even birth control but I talked to them about it in a way as to not condone it. I also told them that if they chose not to heed my advice then don't look to me nor my wife to provide them with birth control. They knew they could get it elsewhere, however.
I don't mean its not one that i do, i mean its not one of the 'normal acts'. Teaching kids that it is normal or healthy sexual activity is unquestionably subversive.
You are a depraved person to promote teaching children about abnormal behavior like that. And anyone teaching it, I suspect their motives are perverse in themselves. No normal well balanced child is going to go 'oh, i feel like inserting my arm into this person who i like, I wonder what the proper way to do that is, i wish they would have covered that in sex ed.' You people are unbelievable in how far gone you are.
Then please inform us, what is the list of these "normal acts?"
And that is why parents are free to opt out of these programs for their children and free to send them to private schools or homeschool if they wish to be naive about a child's sexual experiences.
Teaching children isn't a "waste of time." The more educated children are, the better chance they will make good choices in their own lives....though their are always going to be parents who think their little angels would never have sex or any sexual act, yet it is often times their little angels who are earning names in their schools for the sexual acts they perform.
I wonder how many parents that don't want their children learning about sex know what their children want to learn about. Biology tells us that we all want to learn more about sex.
Read the links I posted, in most of those examples, the parents were not notified or given the opportunity to opt out.
Of course teaching children non-educational things like sex and "anti-bullying" "social justice" progressivism is a waste of time. People send (well sent) their children to public school to learn math, science, history, English, etc, to prepare them for college or to prepare them for becoming a contributing member of society.
It is none of your business, it is none of my business, and it sure as he!! isn't the school's business WHAT a parent does or does not want to teach their child about sex.
Guess what, sex education is a boondoggle thought up by progressives after the "sexual revolution" of the '60's. When the pill was introduced into society so men could convince women to have sex more casually, since the issue of pregnancy was no longer on the table.
Before sex became the focal point of the progressives, our youth were seen as capable of self control and common sense. Today, children are seen as uncontrollable sex objects that need to be indulged by providing them with BC and instructional videos on S&M and pornography.
The purpose of sex education is to reinforce the media created myth that everyone is having sex and parents are too stupid or prude to help you out with BC or information on killing your unwanted "consequences" of "hooking up."
Sex Education is an extension of PP. PP NEEDS the myth that a girl's self esteem is based on her right to engage in meaningless and casual sex so they can keep filling their coffers with money from all those 12-17 year old girls who can come to them in secret to get BC, abortions or talk about ideas for engaging in creative sex with their boyfriends.
Read the links I posted, in most of those examples, the parents were not notified or given the opportunity to opt out.
Of course teaching children non-educational things like sex and "anti-bullying" "social justice" progressivism is a waste of time. People send (well sent) their children to public school to learn math, science, history, English, etc, to prepare them for college or to prepare them for becoming a contributing member of society.
It is none of your business, it is none of my business, and it sure as he!! isn't the school's business WHAT a parent does or does not want to teach their child about sex.
Guess what, sex education is a boondoggle thought up by progressives after the "sexual revolution" of the '60's. When the pill was introduced into society so men could convince women to have sex more casually, since the issue of pregnancy was no longer on the table.
Before sex became the focal point of the progressives, our youth were seen as capable of self control and common sense. Today, children are seen as uncontrollable sex objects that need to be indulged by providing them with BC and instructional videos on S&M and pornography.
The purpose of sex education is to reinforce the media created myth that everyone is having sex and parents are too stupid or prude to help you out with BC or information on killing your unwanted "consequences" of "hooking up."
Sex Education is an extension of PP. PP NEEDS the myth that a girl's self esteem is based on her right to engage in meaningless and casual sex so they can keep filling their coffers with money from all those 12-17 year old girls who can come to them in secret to get BC, abortions or talk about ideas for engaging in creative sex with their boyfriends.
Read the links I posted, in most of those examples, the parents were not notified or given the opportunity to opt out.
Of course teaching children non-educational things like sex and "anti-bullying" "social justice" progressivism is a waste of time. People send (well sent) their children to public school to learn math, science, history, English, etc, to prepare them for college or to prepare them for becoming a contributing member of society.
It is none of your business, it is none of my business, and it sure as he!! isn't the school's business WHAT a parent does or does not want to teach their child about sex.
Guess what, sex education is a boondoggle thought up by progressives after the "sexual revolution" of the '60's. When the pill was introduced into society so men could convince women to have sex more casually, since the issue of pregnancy was no longer on the table.
Before sex became the focal point of the progressives, our youth were seen as capable of self control and common sense. Today, children are seen as uncontrollable sex objects that need to be indulged by providing them with BC and instructional videos on S&M and pornography.
The purpose of sex education is to reinforce the media created myth that everyone is having sex and parents are too stupid or prude to help you out with BC or information on killing your unwanted "consequences" of "hooking up."
Sex Education is an extension of PP. PP NEEDS the myth that a girl's self esteem is based on her right to engage in meaningless and casual sex so they can keep filling their coffers with money from all those 12-17 year old girls who can come to them in secret to get BC, abortions or talk about ideas for engaging in creative sex with their boyfriends.
That is debatable, many parents seem to be clueless of the sexual activities of their children. And seeing you seem to think sex isn't something that can be educational, I guess it makes more sense to let children learn the hard way....but once they get pregnant or an STD, I am sure they will learn quickly the mistakes they made.
So tell us, how do you like a high teen pregnancy and std rate?
Utter BS! Some parents whether they be left or right don't want to talk to their kids about sex but you haven't provided any proof that it is a right wing thing only nor that it represents the majority of them. I am a conservative and I talked to my teenagers about sex and yes even birth control but I talked to them about it in a way as to not condone it. I also told them that if they chose not to heed my advice then don't look to me nor my wife to provide them with birth control. They knew they could get it elsewhere, however.
Anything you don't have to be introduced to by an insane person.
Well that might be the most vague list I have ever seen, what classifies as an insane person? I don't think sexual acts like fisting is something only insane people do, I think there are plenty of normal people who do it too....heck, I am sure there are people you think are normal that do lots of things in the bedroom you wouldn't think is normal for yourself.
So I will ask again, what is a list of "normal sex acts?"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.