Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dont forget the stimulus bill was mostly "trickle up".. all of that welfare spending, we were told was going to jump start the economy because "food stamps" have a 2.5 multiplier..
Thats what they actually said, yep.. its ridiculous.
If that was true, high poverty regions in the nation would have economic booms rather than massive poverty.
Trickle up can work but no, not in that way. Let people keep more of their own money and they will spend more.
Food stamps is not an economic policy. I support "helping" people out but its to help them out, it's not an economic policy.
They are simply spending my money as opposed to me spending it.
When you raise the cost of doing business, less business gets done. Obama has been a master at this, with his tidal waves of regulation and uncertainty and government expansion.
When you raise the cost of hiring people, less people get hired. Obamacare, regulation, minimum wage...any of these ring a bell?
When you directly attack capital investments, the lifeblood of productivity growth and wage growth, you get less capital investment.
Obama has crafted the weakest economic recovery in history. It is no accident, it is not Bush's fault, Europe isn't to blame. Pelosi helped, Reid helped, Dodd and Frank and all the rest of the usual suspects helped. But this is President Obama's signature achievement.
^The answer is yes, it really is still a mystery to some. And it's usually obvious who they are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.