Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With the only exception being stiffer penalties and stronger action by the courts to fine companies much sooner than this. I would imagine it wouldn't be too hard to put the dirty folks out of business eventually if they are sued when they flagrantly violate regulations repeatedly.
With the only exception being stiffer penalties and stronger action by the courts to fine companies much sooner than this. I would imagine it wouldn't be too hard to put the dirty folks out of business eventually if they are sued when they flagrantly violate regulations repeatedly.
I think the ruling was useless... consider if they made 100 M in profit by doing just that and then paying the 30 M fine... they still made 70 M... the fine should be equal if not greater than the profit of the company during those times. Otherwise it is an incentive for them to keep doing it and paying the fine... the fine should be relative to the profit..
I think the ruling was useless... consider if they made 100 M in profit by doing just that and then paying the 30 M fine... they still made 70 M... the fine should be equal if not greater than the profit of the company during those times. Otherwise it is an incentive for them to keep doing it and paying the fine... the fine should be relative to the profit..
Interesting point.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.