Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2015, 12:50 PM
 
Location: CO
2,172 posts, read 1,453,673 times
Reputation: 972

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"A think tank with ties to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton issued strong criticisms Thursday of the Obama administration’s strategy to combat the Islamic State, with analysts writing that the U.S. is “failing” and needs to change course. Two former Obama national security aides broke with the president by urging the deployment of American ground troops to directly help the disheveled Iraqi army. One used the word “failing” to describe how the administration is arming the Baghdad military."

Hillary Clinton-tied think tank bashes Obama's ISIS war strategy - Washington Times

So, does Hillary lose the black vote or the peacenik vote? The ex-Obama administrators, one who is looking for a spot as Hillary's Defense Secretary, are calling for ground troops. Is this an Obama diss?
Your 1st rodeo (election cycle)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2015, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,463,404 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"A think tank with ties to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton issued strong criticisms Thursday of the Obama administration’s strategy to combat the Islamic State,
The link to Hillary is very weak - she has little if anything to do with the CNAS think tank.

Center for a New American Security - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 02:55 PM
 
4,582 posts, read 3,408,206 times
Reputation: 2605
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
But what about the lefty peaceniks like Code Pink, for example, and all of the snoozes in academia? It seems to me if she was going to fly in Obama's face, she'd side with them for a full pull out. This looks like she's alienating the black vote and the peacenik vote.
Remeber what happened the last time Code Ponk desire to maintain a consistant message all of the sudden put them on the wrong side of liberals: All of the sudden they, to the media, no longer existed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,472,256 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
...

So, does Hillary lose the black vote or the peacenik vote? The ex-Obama administrators, one who is looking for a spot as Hillary's Defense Secretary, are calling for ground troops. Is this an Obama diss?
No. It's politics.

[get ready for the dog and pony show]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 08:13 PM
 
32,062 posts, read 15,058,461 times
Reputation: 13685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Hillary knows that the Gruberites will vote for her just like they did for Obama, although some of the black vote will probably stay home because she does not have the capacity to inspire them in the way that Barack Obama did.

So she is moving to the middle before the primary even begins. Obviously a candidate could not do this in the Republican primary, even if was as uncompetitive as the Democratic field appears to be this cycle, as Republican voters would regard that as a demonstration of utter disrespect and disregard for the values of that constituency.

But considering the lack of comparable standards by the Gruberites, - she can do really pretty much anything and they will vote for her - the devout anti-war left may whine and moan about this, but they will vote for her come November 2016 and Hillary Clinton knows it. It is probably a pretty shrewd move on her part.

The left has already gone all-in with Hillary. Who else are they going to vote for?
I'm sure there will be a few to step in like martin o'malley. We are not all hillary fans. But I would rather have a few than a kazillion republicans running lol What a nightmare all the debates will be for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,935,420 times
Reputation: 3416
I don't like Obama and I can't stand the Clintons, but what this is all about is Hillary sticking her finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing. She would throw her mother under the bus unjustifiably in order to get elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2015, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,802 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62199
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrexDigit View Post
Your 1st rodeo (election cycle)?
I'm probably old enough to be your mother. My first election was Nixon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2015, 05:22 PM
 
27,139 posts, read 15,313,785 times
Reputation: 12069
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Not sure what you mean here. We were talking about her policy stances on peace/war and on racial issues. It really won't be hard for her to look better than an R on those issues.


All she has to do is continue to pretend.
Too bad for her it does not come off as genuine.
TO her advantage there are many that won't even notice it or will excuse it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top