Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should the U.S. become 100% democracy and let the majority decide?
Yes 4 13.33%
No 26 86.67%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2015, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,938,291 times
Reputation: 16587

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
Bad idea. They would end up deporting all non whites from the U.S.
We were always a republican form of government and for good reason.

A true democracy is five wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. Very bad idea unless you are one of the wolves.

Personally I spit on democracy and it is the worst form of government one could ask for.

 
Old 06-06-2015, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,210,859 times
Reputation: 4590
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
I *like* the constitution.
To be fair, there really isn't a Constitution. America, like it or not, is a Democracy. To the extent that the Constitution exists, it is mostly a recommendation, not a limitation. It is "reinterpreted" constantly, and almost none of the Constitution means today what it meant 220+ years ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
You only have to look at the different outcomes of the French and American Revolutions to see why.
Well, this is an unfair comparison. The beauty of the American Revolution, was that it was about natural rights, freedom, and a distrust of government.

The French Revolution was to a large extent about equality/egalitarianism. Basically, the French Revolution was socialist. Which is exactly why it was so garbage.

History of socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The only thing which ever made America not garbage, was our citizens distrust of government. The beauty of the Constitution, was it attempted to codify for all-time, and embed in our culture, governmental restraint. Basically, the second amendment isn't still in effect because of the Constitution. It is still in effect because the people.


Sadly, the people here are going downhill, and thus so is our government.


I would only tolerate true democracy if it was actually based on a "consent of the governed".
 
Old 06-06-2015, 09:58 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,284,457 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
That would require a major rewrite of the Constitution of every state and fed.

Not going to happen.
Actually it wouldn't. Congress could pass a federal referendums act. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say how or how no Congress should proceed with voting on laws. Most states have referendums anyway.
 
Old 06-06-2015, 09:59 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,284,457 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
We were always a republican form of government and for good reason.

A true democracy is five wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. Very bad idea unless you are one of the wolves.

Personally I spit on democracy and it is the worst form of government one could ask for.
Then you spit on what we have. A republic is a form of democracy.
 
Old 06-06-2015, 10:59 AM
 
15,092 posts, read 8,636,857 times
Reputation: 7432
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
Then you spit on what we have. A republic is a form of democracy.
Baloney. This isn't a democracy, nor a republic, in any sense of those words. This is a "Plutocracy", where the illusion of choice exists to keep the masses bickering among themselves, while the plutocrats continue unchallenged.

We have the republicans giving lip service to one segment, while the democrats pander to another ... we have politicians of every stripe, making promises that are never fulfilled, yet the masses behind each continue to align themselves with the most convincing liar presented to them.

They ... the plutocrats don't care who you support. Because evey single one of them are there for no other purpose than continue the illusion of choice. So long as you keep choosing a side, the illusion of choice remains alive.

It's like having a crap sandwich as the only menu item. You're free to choose white, wheat or rye, but it's still a crap sandwich, regardless.
 
Old 06-06-2015, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,790,545 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by MX City visiting View Post
Do you think the majority should have the right to decide during elections/referendums in terms of everything?

Democracy Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (U.S. ranks 19th place; many European countries and Canada have higher democracy index rate)
Anyone who votes yes in this silly poll are as misguided as the op.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
Baloney. This isn't a democracy, nor a republic, in any sense of those words. This is a "Plutocracy", where the illusion of choice exists to keep the masses bickering among themselves, while the plutocrats continue unchallenged.
I'd say it's more of an oligarchy, as both parties cater the collective political class as a whole. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your politician" should be the mantra today.

Just imagine how bad it would truly be if we had started out as a pure democracy.

I'd rather have the illusion of hope still alive than no hope at all.


RAND PAUL 2016
 
Old 06-06-2015, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,375,553 times
Reputation: 73937
No.
Too many idiots.
 
Old 06-06-2015, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Inyokern, CA
1,609 posts, read 1,079,490 times
Reputation: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by MX City visiting View Post
Do you think the majority should have the right to decide during elections/referendums in terms of everything?

Democracy Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (U.S. ranks 19th place; many European countries and Canada have higher democracy index rate)
Absolutely NOT! I have worked for years with many different organizations that, with 400+ members at meetings trying to "legislate" their governing rules, have screwed things up so bad it is unreal. 99% of what they try to do ends up just being a huge argument because they can never come to consensus, let alone a correct end result. There is no way a pure democracy will work. Our Democratic Republic, if our representatives were in office for the purposes of "the best interests of America" which is layed out by our Constitution is the best the world has ever seen. It is unfortunate that so many of "we, the people," haven't taken the time to study what our government should and should not do before casting our vote and end up electing incompetent legislators or self-serving un-American legislators, city, county, state and federal all included.

Even as sorry as some of our citizens vote, our Constitution is the finest document laying out the path for government the world has ever seen. We just need to follow that document WITHOUT ALL THE DAM*ED LAWYER/ATTORNEY "INTERPRETATIONS." There is no "interpretation." Our Constitution is written in plain English and simple language. Perhaps our next Amendment should address "no lawyers/attorneys may be elected to government bodies." Or perhaps better, all the above in quotes and add ...without taking and passing a test on understanding the English language and receive a grade of "A" and will not be allowed to interpret anything." VBG I'm obviously being a bit facetious here, but do I get my point across?
 
Old 06-06-2015, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Just outside of McDonough, Georgia
1,057 posts, read 1,131,048 times
Reputation: 1335
No. As Winston Churchill once said, "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."

No country on Earth has full direct democracy, not even Switzerland. One of the key necessities for direct democracy is an informed and educated populace, but judging from the crap I see on this site, cable news channels, talk radio and call-in shows, and internet comment sections, I think direct democracy would be a terrible idea.

- skbl17
 
Old 06-06-2015, 12:13 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,961,090 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
That would require a major rewrite of the Constitution of every state and fed.

Not going to happen.
We no longer live in a constitutional republic either
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top