Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have dreaded this day because this is a racist, sexist, fear-mongering bill," Winn reportedly said, according to a transcript of an audio recording of the hearing. "I would like first to apologize to the progressively minded people of Kansas who are appalled that we are turning back the hands of time...um...regarding to, and I am going to use strong language, Jim Crow tactics, and once again making Kansas a laughingstock."
The Democratic Caucus fully supports Rep. Winn in this matter," House Minority Leader Tom Burroughs, of Kansas City, said in an earlier statement. "This investigation is nothing but an attempt by the majority party to silence a minority voice that dared to speak up in opposition to discrimination. She has a constitutionally protected right to voice her opinion on this or any other issue, as do all Kansans.”
Two Dems are on the committee so most likely she will remain
Winn, who is black, also said that she wanted to apologize, "to the students and their parents whose lives are being hijacked by the racist bigots who support this bill."
It was a bill to repeal in state tuition for illegals.
If a White person had said that they'd be forced to resign but Blacks can say anything ?
Winn, who is black, also said that she wanted to apologize, "to the students and their parents whose lives are being hijacked by the racist bigots who support this bill."
It was a bill to repeal in state tuition for illegals.
If a White person had said that they'd be forced to resign but Blacks can say anything ?
She has a right to voice her opinion. Do you think she is getting special treatment for being black?
She has a right to say what she wants but she shouldn't back pedal once she says it.
Winn denied that she was calling individual committee members racists. She said she was referring to supporters of the bill, adding that the bill was an example of what she called "institutional racism."
Yes, she was calling individual committee members racist if they supported the bill. Her right or not she is a moron.
She has a right to say what she wants but she shouldn't back pedal once she says it.
Winn denied that she was calling individual committee members racists. She said she was referring to supporters of the bill, adding that the bill was an example of what she called "institutional racism."
Yes, she was calling individual committee members racist if they supported the bill. Her right or not she is a moron.
Just how is she a Moron? She is an elected official and you are just someone posting on the CD forum.
You know she is right but don't want to admit she is right.
Just how is she a Moron? She is an elected official and you are just someone posting on the CD forum.
You know she is right but don't want to admit she is right.
I support our laws on immigration and wished our government did too.
I don't support benefits to illegal aliens that have invaded our country.
Calling people racists just because they disagree with you that those here illegally should get the same benefits as those here legally is being a moron.
Quote:
She is an elected official and you are just someone posting on the CD forum.
You know she is right but don't want to admit she is right.
I stand by my statement, no back peddling. If she had a valid point she wouldn't have to back peddle.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.