Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,469,695 times
Reputation: 8599

Advertisements

Alabama Senate Bill 377 would remove the state from marriage licensing. Instead of a getting pre-approval to marry (ie a marriage license good for 30 days) you can just file a marriage contract. It will be a crime (misdemeanour) to get married and not file a marriage contract ($75) with the county clerk within 30 days, and a marriage is still not legal until the contract is filed.

It is unclear if a county clerk can refuse to file a contract on personal religious grounds.

It is unclear if just signing a contract will suffice as the bill says "A civil or religious ceremony may be required to be married." Required by who? The county may require a ceremony with a recognized official? You have to find a judge or pastor willing to marry you?

It also appears that the ID requirement (present your drivers license, other gov't id etc...) is gone, and possibly in-person requirements, and this could lead to credit or benefits fraud.

text: https://legiscan.com/AL/text/SB377/id/1232785

Alabama Senate Approves Bill to Abolish Marriage Licensing - Ben Swann's Truth In Media

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:
Section 1. (a) Effective July 1, 2015, the only
requirement to be married in this state shall be for parties
who are otherwise legally authorized to be married to enter
into a contract of marriage as provided herein.
Page 1
1 (b) A contract to be married shall contain the
2 following minimum information:
3 (1) The names of the parties.
4 (2) A statement that the parties are legally
5 authorized to be married.
6 (3) A statement that the parties voluntarily and
7 based on each parties' own freewill enter into a marriage.
8 (4) The signatures of the parties.
9 The marriage contract shall be witnessed by two
10 adult witnesses.
11 (c) A marriage contract meeting the requirements of
12 this section shall be valid upon recording.
13 (d) A civil or religious ceremony may be required to
14 be married.

"Any judge, minister of the gospel, or other person
2 uniting persons in matrimony or any clerk or keeper of the
3 minutes of a religious society celebrating marriage by the
4 consent of the parties before the congregation, who fails to
5 return a certificate thereof to file the contract of marriage
6 with the judge of probate, as required by law, is guilty of a
7 misdemeanor.

Last edited by katzpaw; 06-29-2015 at 08:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
So basically, we won't be doing marriage, but we will still be doing marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:30 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
So basically, we won't be doing marriage, but we will still be doing marriage.
Sounds like marriage law written by Abbott & Costello.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:33 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,080,699 times
Reputation: 14688
So who is it that is "rewriting" marriage now?? Every God-fearing fundamentalist should be raging against this redefinition of marriage.

Lame idea that probably won't go anywhere, but makes fundamentalists feel good for a few minutes, as they think they are somehow denying "traditional" marriage to gays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top