Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Us continues to waste money of course, its right at the tip of the finger...."PRINT" but, then who pays it back? where is the accountability in all this?
Quote:
When you say wasteful spending, what do you mean?
Things that didn’t work; things that the Afghans didn’t know about, didn’t want or can’t use; and things that can’t be sustained. We identified, for example, $400 to 500 million for airplanes that the U.S. purchased for the Afghan Air Force. The Afghan Air Force couldn’t use them. They were the wrong planes for that country. They basically had to be destroyed and we got three cents on the dollar.
The American money we have wasted pales in comparison to the American lives we have wasted for the people of Afghanistan. There is no one and nothing there worth the life of an American serviceman.
The American money we have wasted pales in comparison to the American lives we have wasted for the people of Afghanistan. There is no one and nothing there worth the life of an American serviceman.
I Agree.... then again, is an Afghan life worth lesser than an American one? many of them died as innocent people or they died defending their country,...sovereignty
It's all about keeping reasons for spending $$$$ on military hardware supplied by the corporations who's stock holders demand the profits! And the lobbyists who roam the halls in Washington to keep it coming!
Was apparent long ago. Government hiring practices make it difficult for people on the ground to get in a position to do something. Oh you're an engineer already working on a infrastructure project in Afghanistan, and you're applying for a job on the government side of the project. That's nice. If you get the job, you can come back to the U.S. To train you how to live and work in Afghanistan for six months even though you're already doing just that.
Those places were a particular embrassment though. Lockheed, Mitsubishi, and a half dozen other American, Japanese, British, and German companies already have designs from the WWII era for top of the line, combat tested, prop planes that can provide close air support that could go into production in a matter of months and for a cost of only a few million.
Because the Afghan government in power at the time refused to give up Osama bin Laden after he blew up our World Trade Center, Pentagon, four airplanes and about 3,000 of our citizens.
Because the Afghan government in power at the time refused to give up Osama bin Laden after he blew up our World Trade Center, Pentagon, four airplanes and about 3,000 of our citizens.
Always with the truth.
The biggest problem was that Afghanistan should have been broken up into about five different countries after the king declined to resume his thrown. If we'd done that two areas could have been handed over to Uzbekistan and Tajikistan within months of the invasion. The new nation of Hazarastan or Hazarajat with its capital in Bamyan could have been given responsibility for its security about A year later. ISAF would have needed to stay in the newly created Republic (or Kingdom headed by the Shah's son) of Persia capitaled by Herat, and the Islamic Republic of Pashtunistan with its capital in Kabul or Kandahar. Five years in ISAF probably could have left the Republic of Persia.
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,953,657 times
Reputation: 16466
Or we couldda just nuked em back to the 8th century and saved trillions.
Oh, wait, that would still put them 400 years ahead of their time...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.