Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-28-2015, 09:06 AM
 
265 posts, read 191,833 times
Reputation: 191

Advertisements

MOST REPUBLICANS, AND ESPECIALLY DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS ARE EXTREMELY QUIET ABOUT THIS...
Why did Obama's Department of Justice (DOJ) just pull the teeth from their own Inspector General?
Obama is about to hide EVEN MORE of his administration's misconduct from the People
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2015, 09:28 AM
 
1,603 posts, read 1,112,924 times
Reputation: 1175
Because in his hands the DOJ has been transformed into the Dept. of Injustice, a weapon that he can wield against his enemies (aka Americans).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2015, 09:32 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,112,566 times
Reputation: 8011
Ummm, because an Office of Inspector General investigation can result in a criminal proceeding only if DOJ accepts it? Isn't that what you people want, a criminal investigation? Maybe that's why GOP is not complaining?

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2015, 11:33 AM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,322,042 times
Reputation: 9447
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Ummm, because an Office of Inspector General investigation can result in a criminal proceeding only if DOJ accepts it? Isn't that what you people want, a criminal investigation? Maybe that's why GOP is not complaining?

Mick
No because the New York Times got the story wrong. There was no criminal referral in the first place.

In Clinton email inquiry, a changing story - POLITICO

Clinton email scandal could prompt criminal probe - POLITICO

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clin...igation-356891

Signed no fan of Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2015, 12:12 PM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,262,756 times
Reputation: 11906
Why you ask?

How else can they continue to HIDE all the bodies?

“The department’s refusal to provide records on a timely basis as required by law wastes months in bureaucratic roadblocks and frustrates the independent oversight Congress created inspectors general to provide,” Sens. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and John Conyers Jr. (Mich.) said in a joint statement, accusing the legal counsel’s office of undermining the independence of federal watchdogs.

I applaud Democrat, John Conyers for joining the Republican DOJ Oversight Committee in condemning this new "rule". It's almost unbelievable that the Democrats in Congress continue to pretend this is not happening - they break every Oath they ever took and don't seem to care about that.

Justice Dept. watchdog blasts his own agency for blocking access to wiretaps, grand jury cases and says his job is undermined |Washington Post

This goes all the way back to the Fast & Furious Records that the DOJ is still refusing (under Court Order and Congressional Censure) to Congress. The Inspector General testified that whistle blower cases and other cases involving information from the Justice Department have "lagged" for years. They are also very concerned that other Departments and Agencies will do the same thing - "Official Stonewalling" with their own "rule", which ignores (once against) Law passed by Congress. DOJ is saying that their OWN Office of Legal Council has the right to act as a "Supreme Court" and deny access on anything they deem "secret or confidential". The Administration Corruption across all Departments (but especially the crucial DOJ) is breathtaking. The truth WILL eventually come out - they can't destroy ALL the Hard Drives in Government.

We now have the answer to the question - Is Loretta Lynch another Eric Holder? ..... you bet she is, this new "rule" was issued on HER WATCH -- which means she LIED in her Congressional Hearing to get confirmed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top