Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did you bother to read the "article"? Hillary asked to borrow a general email usage guidebook called “Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better." She didn't ask to borrow a book that is about how to erase emails, as this "article" implies. But this is all academic because someone like Hillary is not going to be erasing anything on her own, she undoubtedly has IT experts to assist her with that to achieve whatever objectives that she is trying to accomplish (she has admitted to erasing personal emails). Afterall, it could destroy her chances in 2016, why DIY to save few bucks? Do you believe that she does her own kitchen renovations, too?
Did you bother to read the "article"? Hillary asked to borrow a general email usage guidebook called “Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better." She didn't ask to borrow a book that is about how to erase emails, as this "article" implies. But this is all academic because someone like Hillary is not going to be erasing anything on her own, she undoubtedly has IT experts to assist her with that to achieve whatever objectives that she is trying to accomplish (she has admitted to erasing personal emails). Afterall, it could destroy her chances in 2016, why DIY to save few bucks? Do you believe that she does her own kitchen renovations, too?
Mick
Your first comments are fair, not so much after.
Why not try an delete it as best as you can yourself before trusting someone else with it?
We are talking about erasing emails not heavy construction.
Let me guess, you are on Team Hillary and are fine with it?
Did you bother to read the "article"? Hillary asked to borrow a general email usage guidebook called “Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better." She didn't ask to borrow a book that is about how to erase emails, as this "article" implies. But this is all academic because someone like Hillary is not going to be erasing anything on her own, she undoubtedly has IT experts to assist her with that to achieve whatever objectives that she is trying to accomplish (she has admitted to erasing personal emails). Afterall, it could destroy her chances in 2016, why DIY to save few bucks? Do you believe that she does her own kitchen renovations, too?
Mick
I have no doubt you are correct, however once her tech experts are put on the stand facing federal conspiracy charges, they will be singing the sweetest song you ever hear.
All of her inner circle will soon be turning on the old girl to save themselves... Some of her closest allies may be willing to go to jail for her, but once one starts talking, the dam is going to break and she will be washed away in the deluge..
Some of her closest allies may be willing to go to jail for her, but once one starts talking, the dam is going to break and she will be washed away in the deluge..
Shades of Vince Foster!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nobody will do any telling on the Hildabeast.
A few years vacation at club Fed for contempt, is better than being declared a suicide with six slugs in your brain.
Oh please! You put your faith in a story like this based on a report by ABC News' own liar specialist reporter Jonathan Karl who Jake Tapper, his former co-worker at ABC, personally was the first to out as a liar on a reporting claim made by Karl on Benghazi?
In particular note in the following link that Karl "...seriously singed himself by making it really, really look like he was looking at the e-mails when he wasn't." Who burned ABC News on the Benghazi emails?
And note the last 2 paragraphs in the link below that lay out Jonathan Karl's background, including his training at a media course designed to promote conservative media on college campuses. Also found at the article end is more discussion of his glaring errors in reporting.
If I watch the news, I don't want a danged reporter's own political views to intrude on the story. I simply want the danged truth! It's reporters like Karl who make me curse at my tv & want to throw a rock at the set during the news.
Slanted news coverage to fit an agenda is slanted news whether it's tilted to benefit the right or benefit the left. Serious Ethical Questions Arising From Journalist's Participation In Koch Event | ThinkProgress
Last edited by atler8; 08-13-2015 at 06:19 PM..
Reason: punctuation error
That is good point. I have no faith in Obama's DOJ doing anything about this.
Read the excellent and entertaining Blood Feud by Edward Klein and you might realign your thinking. I tend to think that there is still a feud between the Obamas and Clintons. Bill in particular will never get over being race-baited in South Carolina in 2008. This puts Pres Obama, as overseer of the DOJ and FBI, in the position of potentially deciding Hillary's fate. Obama has proven very adept at these kinds of executive branch power plays. See Fast and Furious, Lois Lerner and the IRS, etc.
I think it's 50/50 whether he would decide to hang Hillary out to dry. He might prefer Sanders, or even work behind the scenes to get Warren in the race.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
