Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Cummings statement made it perfectly clear why this inquiry has drug on for 18 months, the Democrats have absolutely no interest in getting to the truth, all they are interested in is protecting the party and the guilty witch.
Deflect and protect, thy haven't yet asked one question to get at the truth, a complete cover up. Shameful.
How you know the tide has changed:
In both his round 1 & round 2, Gowdy used his entire opening statement time to try to justify and demand his committee's existence.
Even he knows it's all gone south for the GOP on Benghazi.
3 hours in: after taking great offense at being accused of conducting a prosecution, Gowdy proceeds to sound and look exactly like a prosecutor who knows he's losing his case and is frantically trying (and failing) to rattle the chief witness.
You are dreaming, Gowdy is kicking the murderess' behind...
How you know the tide has changed:
In both his round 1 & round 2, Gowdy used his entire opening statement time to try to justify and demand his committee's existence.
Even he knows it's all gone south for the GOP on Benghazi.
The last few minutes of the first three hours were golden, as Gowdy tried desperately to keep from being forced to release all the transcripts he has thus far refused to release. Look for that exchange to dominate the news cycles and probably even show up in some campaign ads in the future.
If there was a moment when it all fell apart for Gowdy, that was it.
I wish they would release all of it. Of course, what do we do about Hillary erasing the thousands we can allegedly no longer recover?
It's the GOP that's refusing to release the transcripts.
Despite Gowdy's hyperfocus on the emails, they are only a tiny part of the record that's being withheld. So far there's nothing to suggest that any deleted emails would shed light on what happened in Benghazi.
So is the gist of all this that she may not have done anything criminally wrong? She was instead simply hopelessly incompetent, unable to perform the requirements of the job, and failed to properly manage her subordinates at State?
So is the gist of all this that she may not have done anything criminally wrong? She was instead simply hopelessly incompetent, unable to perform the requirements of the job, and failed to properly manage her subordinates at State?
In a nutshell, yes. And it has been discovered that she deleted gov't records to protect herself from incrimination or signs of incompetence which would affect her political aspirations to be POTUS.
So is the gist of all this that she may not have done anything criminally wrong? She was instead simply hopelessly incompetent, unable to perform the requirements of the job, and failed to properly manage her subordinates at State?
So she demonstrates that she has ability to assume Obama's job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
