Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2008, 07:38 PM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,692,112 times
Reputation: 1266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW1;2717787[COLOR=black
So, I can only conclude that I am a Liberal Libertarian. I like that concept.[/color]
I'm sorry, liberal-yes, libertarian-no. Libertarianism is a principled ideology, not simply a set of stances on issues. Just because you agree with libertarians on some issues doesn't mean you qualify as a Libertarian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2008, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Asheville, NC
366 posts, read 1,016,875 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
And the fact that all these men are all electable Republicans should indicate that you shouldn't listen to Fox News so much In determining the "true face" of the GOP, voters supercede whatever drivel you hear on TV.
While I'm a independent that wouldn't call myself conservative, as I think I'm centrist to slightly liberal leaning that was a great post overall and I especially took note of this one comment as I know a few people who view Fox News as the be all end all of the republican party. I tend to think that is a rather narrow minded view, regardless of your political beliefs and/or views. I am getting the impression with some very conservative republicans (which seem to outnumber the more moderate ones in my area) that they're painting a scenario where it's you're either for us , or against us, as if there are no shades of grey. I thought it was just limited to the forums but I've had people in person tell me that if McCain is the republican nominee they will not vote period. No if's and's or but's about it. In some ways I'm still rather stunned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 02:56 AM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,345 posts, read 51,930,608 times
Reputation: 23741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
My criticism is not concerned with immigration policy per se. It is with the expressed intolerance of liberals toward those who disagree with them. Wanting to control the borders does not equal "hating illegals." If that is so, there is a great deal of self-hatred among America's Hispanic population, since many of them support stricter immigration policies.
Are said Hispanics illegal themselves? If not, your comment doesn't make much sense... neither does the whole "intolerance" rambling, but I've grown used to that old line.

Btw, I think about half of you missed fishmonger's original point... LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 04:27 AM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,692,112 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zooropa View Post
While I'm a independent that wouldn't call myself conservative, as I think I'm centrist to slightly liberal leaning that was a great post overall and I especially took note of this one comment as I know a few people who view Fox News as the be all end all of the republican party. I tend to think that is a rather narrow minded view, regardless of your political beliefs and/or views. I am getting the impression with some very conservative republicans (which seem to outnumber the more moderate ones in my area) that they're painting a scenario where it's you're either for us , or against us, as if there are no shades of grey. I thought it was just limited to the forums but I've had people in person tell me that if McCain is the republican nominee they will not vote period. No if's and's or but's about it. In some ways I'm still rather stunned.
Though I'm not a Republican, I can understand their thought processes. When one has strong convictions, to compromise them by voting for someone who does not hold the same convictions is being disloyal to oneself. What good are they doing the party if they vote for someone that does not support the basic party tenets?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:23 AM
 
2,643 posts, read 2,442,995 times
Reputation: 1928
conservatives have damaged this country far more than liberals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
Are said Hispanics illegal themselves? If not, your comment doesn't make much sense... neither does the whole "intolerance" rambling, but I've grown used to that old line.

Btw, I think about half of you missed fishmonger's original point... LOL.
I think you missed my point, in your haste to find a pigeonhole for my post.

Many Hispanics are legal residents or citizens of the United States. Our nation would be much poorer without them. Among that population are many people who are troubled both by the overwhelming numbers of illegal immigrants, and by the strains that their presence is putting on our country's ability to provide services to its legal residents.

Many people would prefer if members of any cultural or racial group could simply be lumped together and considered collectively, so that broad generalizations about them could be wielded more easily. Fortunately, the opposite is true -- there are ranges of opinion within any ethnic and cultural group, many of which run contrary to accepted sociological wisdom. With no group is this more the case than with Hispanic-Americans, who are fiercely independent, ethically centered, and politically diverse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
I just love defining the argument by using loaded terms. I think it is called framing in adspeak Economically I am a socialist. Politically I am a Liberal. In the class war I am a Bolshevik. I believe a civilized and just society provides enough to survive for all before it provides plentitudes for the few. It should never allow wealth to buy legal, moral or economic privilege. The only thing wealth should be able to buy is better booze.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW1 View Post
I just love defining the argument by using loaded terms. I think it is called framing in adspeak Economically I am a socialist. Politically I am a Liberal. In the class war I am a Bolshevik. I believe a civilized and just society provides enough to survive for all before it provides plentitudes for the few. It should never allow wealth to buy legal, moral or economic privilege. The only thing wealth should be able to buy is better booze.
Bolshevik, huh? Nice....

The Soviet Union
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
I never said that all of my personality was "nice".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 11:01 AM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,692,112 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW1 View Post
I just love defining the argument by using loaded terms. I think it is called framing in adspeak Economically I am a socialist. Politically I am a Liberal. In the class war I am a Bolshevik. I believe a civilized and just society provides enough to survive for all before it provides plentitudes for the few. It should never allow wealth to buy legal, moral or economic privilege. The only thing wealth should be able to buy is better booze.
Then, you're far from being a libertarian. The "civilized and just" society that you prefer has been tried and has failed miserably because all economic incentives are removed from society, making everyone simply mediocre at best. Even China has realized that this does not work and is moving more toward capitalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top