Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Obama regime and Hillary Clinton are so breathtakingly corrupt, it is almost unbelievable. Democrats and the left apparently love it that they are, which makes them complicit and just as corrupt as these lying sleazebags that they support.
Their conduct is so brazenly dishonest and lawless....You really cannot make this stuff up.
The State Department cannot find emails sent by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s IT staffer Bryan Pagliano who helped setup Clinton’s private email server, a State Department official told Fox News on Friday.
Alec Gerlach, a State Department spokesman, told Fox News investigators working on recovering Pagliano's emails from the server “have not yet located a .pst that covers the time period of Secretary’s Clinton tenure.”
Before you accuse the State Department of corruption and dishonesty, don't you have to show that it was intentional and for the purpose of protecting Hillary, as opposed to the typical government incompetence or policy? Or don't we care about the facts any more, so we rely on some dubious new organization?
Even Lincoln Chafee said it, "She is just too corrupt to be the president."
When I judge a politician, I try to give everybody benefit of the doubt, I judge a person or a politician by behavior PATTERN, not one single isolated incident. We are talking about her endemic behavior, a pattern of conduct reinforced over decades.
and No, don't even go there. Not every politician is a crook, matter of fact, no other politicians act the way she does.
Her issues of gross incompetence (e.g. failing to protect diplomats in Benghazi, Libya), lack of vision (e.g. no coherent response to the Arab Spring), bad judgment (e.g. Russian reset), and self-delusion (e.g. outreach to Iran and obsessing over the “peace process”).
Is there still whining about Hillary's emails going on?
Is that all you have on this woman? You do know that all the political committee's formed to investigate her have not only made her stronger, but have made Republicans look foolish, right?
Kevin McCarthy exposed this fraud to Sean Hannity, every thinking person in America gets this. The GOP is headed for another flaming tail spin in the next 12 months.
Before you accuse the State Department of corruption and dishonesty, don't you have to show that it was intentional and for the purpose of protecting Hillary, as opposed to the typical government incompetence or policy? Or don't we care about the facts any more, so we rely on some dubious new organization?
Mick
Here coincidence is overwhelming evidence of a corrupt administration. This situation fits perfectly in a pattern of bloody footprints leading to the whitehouse.
when the head of the DOJ can falsify a warrant for journalist Jame Rosen and partake in judge shopping until he finds one that approves his false warrant, missing documents in the state dept become strategy that we saw applied in the IRS investigation, EPA investigation, Fast and Furious investigation and Benghazi investigation.
Is there still whining about Hillary's emails going on?
.
Yes, because there are still no answers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny
Is that all you have on this woman?
Only a fool (not you) would believe this is ALL we have on this woman.
1. Whitewater
Sure, you can argue that The Clintons were both cleared, but the McDougals were jailed for fraud. Scapegoating much?
2. The Clinton Foundation
Much of the foundation’s funding has come from friends of the Clintons and occasionally foreign governments in which Hillary Clinton has taken policy stances as secretary of state.
3. Benghazi:
Four people were killed when attackers ravaged a U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012.
I wonder if she - Clinton deliberately withheld aid? well, obviously, she perhaps did, or she perhaps did not, but it is reason enough for me to never consider her as the next Commander-in-chief. I just will never take that risk. Why should I?
4. Email
Sure, you can argue all day long that her private server could have been hacked, but questions have also been raised over how Clinton selected which emails to turn over and which ones to delete.
Before you accuse the State Department of corruption and dishonesty, don't you have to show that it was intentional and for the purpose of protecting Hillary, as opposed to the typical government incompetence or policy? Or don't we care about the facts any more, so we rely on some dubious new organization?
Mick
Government makes at least 3 backups, so corruption for sure.
Is there still whining about Hillary's emails going on?
Is that all you have on this woman? You do know that all the political committee's formed to investigate her have not only made her stronger, but have made Republicans look foolish, right?
Kevin McCarthy exposed this fraud to Sean Hannity, every thinking person in America gets this. The GOP is headed for another flaming tail spin in the next 12 months.
Hey this may have been over quicker if the State Department actually had her Emails as they well should have.
Trying to withhold information will haunt her always of her own doing.
You are acting as one of the complicit mentioned in the OP.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
