Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think not. It's an eminent domain issue for something important. The Government only needs some easements.
And I'm saying eminent domain is either a violation of people's property rights, or you have to argue that the government is the rightful owner of everything. Those are the only options, which is why I'm against eminent domain.
And I'm saying eminent domain is either a violation of people's property rights, or you have to argue that the government is the rightful owner of everything. Those are the only options, which is why I'm against eminent domain.
there is other measures when the wall does not make sense!
And I'm saying eminent domain is either a violation of people's property rights, or you have to argue that the government is the rightful owner of everything. Those are the only options, which is why I'm against eminent domain.
No, the Supreme Court has upheld Eminent Domain.
I do not like it when it takes private property and gives it to private developers.
But vital infrastructure is something different. And an international border is certainly qualifies as vital infrastructure.
No to eminent domain, but landowners should allow border patrol on their land. In return the Government pays them a fee for access to their land.
Actually, it should be the other way around. If landowners don't want a wall on their property but they want protection then they should pay our government for patrolling their land with the Border Patrol. No different than if you hired a private security company to do so. If they want to do that then they can deal with the illegal aliens and drug cartels themselves and so be it. They'll be crying in their beer in no time.
Actually, it should be the other way around. If landowners don't want a wall on their property but they want protection then they should pay our government for patrolling their land with the Border Patrol. No different than if you hired a private security company to do so. If they want to do that then they can deal with the illegal aliens and drug cartels themselves and so be it. They'll be crying in their beer in no time.
That actually wouldn't be a bad idea. Except no Wall it's a waste of money.
The border is Federal property, that "Trumps" their property rights. The Feds can just take it.
Do you know where the border actually is in many southwestern states?
I bet it's not where you think it is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
