Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2016, 03:37 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
With the solution being to kill, oppress and convert them?
No, the solution is to not allow more of them in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2016, 03:54 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
No, the solution is to not allow more of them in this country.
A lot fewer would come if we quit bombing theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 04:16 AM
 
3,550 posts, read 2,557,244 times
Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by max340 View Post
Where to start? It's been happening since at least 1913.
what in the world happened in 1913 to feed your delusions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 04:20 AM
 
3,550 posts, read 2,557,244 times
Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by max340 View Post
Islam is put up as a proxy enemy to distract attention from the real culprits. It is brilliant psychological manipulation. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend". What better way to make everyone be a friend of the Jews then by pitting them against the Muslims?
Please explain why most Jews in America (who are really atheists) take the pro Muslim side in almost every issue?

Is that a further part of their brilliant psychological manipulation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 04:20 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
A lot fewer would come if we quit bombing theirs.
I don't care why they want to come here.

I only care that we not let them in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 07:11 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
They have to remove the 2nd amendment, before they can really go after the 1st with vigor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 07:22 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
what in the world happened in 1913 to feed your delusions?
The Progressive Socialist movement gaining steam with the Wilson administration, to undermine the chains of the constitution that stood in their way to power and control.

Senators no longer represented the States legislatures best interest.
Actually amended the constitution to take freedom and liberty, not secure it.(which later led to altering and basically abolishing the 2nd amendment, without an amendment with the 1934 firearms act)
Genocide was made legal.
We became the worlds police.
Got us involved in the League of Nations, now the United Nations.

I could go on and on and on.......

Google the Progressive Socialist Movement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I consider one of my fundamental freedoms as an United States citizen is to be willing and able to disparage, insult, condemn and disparage anyone regardless of social status, religious affiliation or political party. This Bill is an absolute absurdity.


OP thank you for this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 09:10 AM
 
3,550 posts, read 2,557,244 times
Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The Progressive Socialist movement gaining steam with the Wilson administration, to undermine the chains of the constitution that stood in their way to power and control.
1. Wilson wasn't the first progressive in power.
2. and Jews somehow were responsible for electing Wilson? Wilson won by a land slide, there was no mass media at the time for anyone to even claim that Jews were the reason he was elected. there is a 99.99999 etc. chance that if their was not a single Jew in the country Wilson still would have been elected.


Quote:
Senators no longer represented the States legislatures best interest.
1. If the 17th amendment never passes I think there is a decent chance that this country would be even more leftist today. Just like almost no Voters care about confirmation picks for the the courts when voting for senators today, almost no voters would care about who was elected to the senate when voting for state legislators. It would be easy for a president to bride senators. considering through most of the last century Dems had a clear majority of the state legislatures, I think this country would have been even more left wing. Remember the income tax amendment passed under the old watch.
2. and Jews certain had nothing to to with passing that amendment the first serious pushes for that amendment came when Jews were a minuscule population in America
3. the bill passed congress in 12, so if Jews were responsible what did they do?



Quote:
Actually amended the constitution to take freedom and liberty, not secure it.(which later led to altering and basically abolishing the 2nd amendment, without an amendment with the 1934 firearms act)
what are you talking about the 16th or 17th amendment how does that have anything to do with the National Firearms Act, are you trying to insinuate that the bill never would have passed under the old system? If so why pick that bill? and what do jews have to do with it?


Quote:
Genocide was made legal.
what????????????????????????????????? Genocide was made legal in 1913?????????????????????????????????

Quote:
We became the worlds police.
1. which country did America police in 1913?
2. America could have been called the worlds police, years earlier
3. becoming the worlds police is not intrinsically bad, if America really was the worlds police in the 1930's WWII would have never happened and thousands of American lives would have been saved



Quote:
Got us involved in the League of Nations, now the United Nations.
1. the league of nations is not the same organization as the UN
2. Wilson failed to get us involved with the League of Nations
3. the league of nations was founded in 1920, and was not even proposed till after WWI began in 1914


Quote:
I could go on and on and on.......

Google the Progressive Socialist Movement.
and I'll see what?
more nonsense that the Progressive Socialist Movement started in 1913 by Jews
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2016, 09:33 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
1. Wilson wasn't the first progressive in power.
Actually a Republican was recognized as the first Progressive. Wilson was the King of making it happen


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
2. and Jews somehow were responsible for electing Wilson? Wilson won by a land slide, there was no mass media at the time for anyone to even claim that Jews were the reason he was elected. there is a 99.99999 etc. chance that if their was not a single Jew in the country Wilson still would have been elected.
Then we got the Federal reserve and the 16th Amendment


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
1. If the 17th amendment never passes I think there is a decent chance that this country would be even more leftist today. Just like almost no Voters care about confirmation picks for the the courts when voting for senators today, almost no voters would care about who was elected to the senate when voting for state legislators. It would be easy for a president to bride senators. considering through most of the last century Dems had a clear majority of the state legislatures, I think this country would have been even more left wing. Remember the income tax amendment passed under the old watch.
Yet we have 30 states with more conservative legislatures and leadership, today


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
2. and Jews certain had nothing to to with passing that amendment the first serious pushes for that amendment came when Jews were a minuscule population in America
Federal Reserve, The IRS for 1000, Alex?


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
3. the bill passed congress in 12, so if Jews were responsible what did they do?
I said the Progressive Socialist Movement. Not a static day in time.



Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
what are you talking about the 16th or 17th amendment how does that have anything to do with the National Firearms Act, are you trying to insinuate that the bill never would have passed under the old system? If so why pick that bill? and what do jews have to do with it?
It should have never passed the Supreme Court, if it was truely unbiased and not a federal government institution, paid by the US Treasury. The Supreme Court is the Federal Government. The fox watching the hen house. "It is a living document" Ya, only when amended. Not by laws.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
what????????????????????????????????? Genocide was made legal in 1913?????????????????????????????????
It was promoted by the Wilson administration and believe it or not, continued into the 1970's(See Penn Hurst Institution)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
1. which country did America police in 1913?
I quote Wilson.... ""Our object now, as then, is to vindicate the principles of peace and justice in the life of the world as against selfish and autocratic power and to set up among the really free and self-governed peoples of the world such a concert of purpose and of action as will henceforth ensure the observance of those principles. Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved and the freedom of its peoples, and the menace to that peace and freedom lies in the existence of autocratic governments backed by organized force which is controlled wholly by their will, not by the will of their people. We have seen the last of neutrality in such circumstances. We are at the beginning of an age in which it will be insisted that the same standards of conduct and of responsibility for wrong done shall be observed among nations and their governments that are observed among the individual citizens of civilized states.""

Making the World "Safe for Democracy": Woodrow Wilson Asks for War



Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
2. America could have been called the worlds police, years earlier
Like I said, The Progressive Socialist Movement was not a static date.

Making the World "Safe for Democracy": Woodrow Wilson Asks for War



Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
3. becoming the worlds police is not intrinsically bad, if America really was the worlds police in the 1930's WWII would have never happened and thousands of American lives would have been saved

Making the World "Safe for Democracy": Woodrow Wilson Asks for War



Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
1. the league of nations is not the same organization as the UN
Rebranded(name change) for the benefit of the allies after WW-11


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
2. Wilson failed to get us involved with the League of Nations
NO, the American people said no. Wilson was the biggest promoter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
3. the league of nations was founded in 1920, and was not even proposed till after WWI began in 1914
Again, you seem to think the Progressive Socialist Movement was a static date.


Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jew View Post
and I'll see what?
more nonsense that the Progressive Socialist Movement started in 1913 by Jews
No, you just may get an education, on the philosophy of Progressive Socialism you blindly follow because of your ignorance, as seen in your response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top