Bingo. So much for "we don't want your hunting guns" (weapon, Brown)

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by eddie gein

Yes it says that right after it says this:

So we are supposed to have well regulated militias in this deal. So where are the militias and who is regulating them "well"?

I'm assuming that nobody is "regulating" the F-troop style militias that we currently have.

Militias are illegal in the USA. Try and organize a group of armed men and women, training them in tactical domestic warfare.

I bet you are locked away as soon as they catch wind of it.

Well regulated militia... organized and trained to use their own weapons.

[ntwrkguy1]

Originally Posted by Bulldogdad

Yup, I've called it Governmental Brandishing since the 80's with the intent to intimidate, in this instance legal gun owners.

Dear Leader was Brandishing on a Grand Scale yesterday.

Notice that, even with all the crocodile tears he shed, he never expressed outrage for those whom he should have......

......the shooters.

But on a positive note, he did reference himself (either via "I" or "we", where he included himself as part of the collective "we") a measly 76 times. In 33 minutes.

[Dude111]

Originally Posted by Kracer

First off America does not have a gun problem.

Well in the elites eyes GUNS ARE A STOPPER!!!!

They really are getting desperate and want to rush in the NWO and they cannot because people are armed and will fight it!! (Which they are trying to rectify now)


HOLD ON TO YOUR GUNS PEOPLE........ ITS THE ONLY THING STOPPING THE NWO FROM ENTERING THE FINAL STAGES AND STARTING!!!

[max340]

Originally Posted by North Beach Person

New tack for the gun grabbers, outlaw all semi-automatic firearms, not just the ugly black ones or so called "assault weapons".

both sporting/hunting guns. For those who don't know what they are, the top one is a shotgun and the bottom example is a rifle.

There goes my hope that if we just painted all guns pink that the gun grabbers would mind their business!

[brownbagg]

Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1

He cries.

just what we need a prez that cries, he be like that preacher that cried on tv because he got caught in the cookie jar. Im so sorry, oh, he already does that.

[freightshaker]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

And has never seen a mad 200lb feral pig charging him.

I can vouch for that.. It's ugly..

[no1brownsfan]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Reality is, you are either a criminal behind bars, or a free person with access to all your rights.
There is no in between (ie, a felon cannot have assess to weapons... Ya, right. Only if they are behind bars, you idiots)

Listen man, I'm sure you're well aware that I firmly support the 2nd Amendment. To me "shall not be infringed" is very clear! The way I see it, own all the guns you want, have as much ammo as you want. The fact that one owns several firearms does not frighten me, like it does many of these leftist anti-gun folks who are uneducated about firearms anyway. Having said now, I as a law abiding citizen should not have to cede my rights away or jump through more hoops, just because of the evil doers in society! However; use a gun to kill someone outside of self defense or defense of your family, and you swing from a rope. Use a gun in a violent crime, and you are convicted, hard time.... mandatory 25 years, no appeals! In other words, you forfeit your rights! I'll also be the first to tell you that there are many unneccessary laws that we could do away with in this country, as well as rethink our stance on the war on drugs given that prohibition does not work, and is designed to create even more criminals due to the black market it creates. But, sadly, too many people profit on both sides. But... that is a topic for a whole other thread.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by eddie gein

Yes it says that right after it says this:

So we are supposed to have well regulated militias in this deal. So where are the militias and who is regulating them "well"?

I'm assuming that nobody is "regulating" the F-troop style militias that we currently have.

Instead of asking questions of us, why don't you look it up yourself.

It HAS been explained on here MANY times.We get tired of repeating ourselves.

[OldDocKat]

My husband would have a fit. He told me when he was very sick our society would change in a way he would not like. I guess he was right?

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by 22backagain

Oh my !!

The sky is falling !!

I say lets rewrite the second amendment, the language is to vague and is misinterpreted by both sides

" the language is to vague and is misinterpreted by both sides" WRONG.

All you have to do is some research on what the Founding Fathers said when they wrote it.

It REALLY is that simple.