Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2016, 06:37 AM
 
5,051 posts, read 3,581,375 times
Reputation: 6512

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
I don't think the media bias is intentional or that orders to be biased towards one candidate or another come down from on high.


However, most people in the media are biased toward liberals. When the executives and the reporters and the news anchors etc are all biased in the same direction, the collective effect of that is media bias.


It's the same with intraparty debates. Most people in the media are probably in favor of Hillary Clonton, therefore, the collective effect of all the people who run the media ends up in a bias toward her.
That may be an accurate observation.

However, the bias is much more pronounced on the Right (if more limited to single source). Fox and Conservative talk shows have been bashing Obama and Hillary nearly 24X7 for years. There is no equivalent campaign for this on the left to assassinate the character of certain politicans in the minds of the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2016, 10:11 AM
 
59,057 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
As clearly evidenced by the incessant media advertising of Trump...
And most of it has been negative!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 10:13 AM
 
59,057 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
That may be an accurate observation.

However, the bias is much more pronounced on the Right (if more limited to single source). Fox and Conservative talk shows have been bashing Obama and Hillary nearly 24X7 for years. There is no equivalent campaign for this on the left to assassinate the character of certain politicans in the minds of the public.
Do you ever listen to liberal talk radio or watch MSNBC?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,370,953 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
This may be a stupid question...

Many of us observed the biases that, say, NBC mods have shown during the debates, favoring Clinton over Sanders. (Never mind if you don't think so, but as long as you agree certain news stations have bias toward presidential candidates) My question is: is this a tacit understanding among the news station's employees, or were they somehow given the instruction to be pro-X and anti-Y (e.g. favoring Clinton and being against Sanders, just as an example)? Did it come from the very top of the station, say CEO or president of NBC, who dictate whoever writes the debate questions in certain biased ways? (what if a mod personally favors Sanders over Clinton? He/she would still have to ask the prepared questions against his/her own will?)
It's what naturally happens when they only hire people with the same beliefs and biases. They don't need instructions from the top when they're all spinning the same direction. The few who disagree won't dare speak up or they'll be fired, the same thing happens in academia, it's hardly an accident that the overwhelming majority of professors - in non engineering fields - are extreme far left liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,370,953 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
That may be an accurate observation.

However, the bias is much more pronounced on the Right (if more limited to single source). Fox and Conservative talk shows have been bashing Obama and Hillary nearly 24X7 for years. There is no equivalent campaign for this on the left to assassinate the character of certain politicans in the minds of the public.
You must be joking, no one can be that blind. Did you never turn on any news station other than Fox for the last 25+ years? You must not have, or if you did you're so blinded by your own partisan bias you can't even recognize it when you see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 01:31 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
All media is biased, one way or the other. If they claim to be fair and balanced, then they lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,601,522 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
NBC has been the Obama support channel. That crown will now be passed to Clinton and they will do everything possible to get her elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,736,454 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
This may be a stupid question...

Many of us observed the biases that, say, NBC mods have shown during the debates, favoring Clinton over Sanders. (Never mind if you don't think so, but as long as you agree certain news stations have bias toward presidential candidates) My question is: is this a tacit understanding among the news station's employees, or were they somehow given the instruction to be pro-X and anti-Y (e.g. favoring Clinton and being against Sanders, just as an example)? Did it come from the very top of the station, say CEO or president of NBC, who dictate whoever writes the debate questions in certain biased ways? (what if a mod personally favors Sanders over Clinton? He/she would still have to ask the prepared questions against his/her own will?)
The simple truth is that the profession of journalism lends itself towards Liberalism. Before there was Fox News, it was widely understood that there would always be significant liberal bias in the news media across the board. Coverage is still heavily Liberal-biased. Not much has changed over the years, though the constant specter of concern over their political bias has driven the increasing trend towards politically biased journalists officially being Independents.



The station execs are more likely to be Republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 03:10 PM
 
59,057 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
The simple truth is that the profession of journalism lends itself towards Liberalism. Before there was Fox News, it was widely understood that there would always be significant liberal bias in the news media across the board. Coverage is still heavily Liberal-biased. Not much has changed over the years, though the constant specter of concern over their political bias has driven the increasing trend towards politically biased journalists officially being Independents.



The station execs are more likely to be Republican.
"it was widely understood that there would always be significant liberal bias in the news media across the board"

I disagree.

When we only had the big three, we did NOT know they were biased.

When conservative talk radio and FOX came along we ONLY GOT THE LEFT LEANING VERSION OF THE NEWS WHICH WAS LEFT BIASED BUT, WE DIDN'T KNOW IT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2016, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,736,454 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"it was widely understood that there would always be significant liberal bias in the news media across the board"

I disagree.

When we only had the big three, we did NOT know they were biased.

When conservative talk radio and FOX came along we ONLY GOT THE LEFT LEANING VERSION OF THE NEWS WHICH WAS LEFT BIASED BUT, WE DIDN'T KNOW IT.
You may be right. I for one was totally shocked watching the election results come in. I believe it was Peter Jennings who said things like, "We might still win X state" and clearly identifying himself with the Democratic Party. It wasn't that I didn't think he was liberal, I just felt he should have the decency to keep his political biases silent under those circumstances.

The most iconic "everyman's" TV news anchors in my lifetime:
Walter Cronkite: Democrat
Dan Rather: Democrat
Peter Jennings: Democrat
Tom Brokaw: Democrat
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top