Judicial Watch: New Emails Show Hillary Clinton and Aides Had Classified Information on Non-Government Email Accounts (Iraq, Obama)

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by Mircea

Judicial Watch: New Emails Show Hillary Clinton and Aides Had Classified Information on Non-Government Email Accounts - Judicial Watch

"When can we expect the indictments?"

Judicial Watch? Nah, they are not partisan at ALL. Of course they want Hillary gone.

The answer to your question is . . never.

[Three Wolves In Snow]

Originally Posted by biscuitmom

A sham article from a right-wing anti-Obama and anti-Clinton rag. Nobody cares.

Originally Posted by Ringo1

Judicial Watch? Nah, they are not partisan at ALL. Of course they want Hillary gone.

The answer to your question is . . never.

Keep sticking your head in the sand, many of these were already released. You can find them here:

https://foia.state.gov/Search/Result...=Clinton_Email

Especially if you narrow it by date. Here's one that JW claimed to have just released that was released back in October:

https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOC.../C05791803.pdf

No, JW did not get anything that anyone else could not get, and has not been able to get, but you two are foolish not to even investigate anything. You dismiss reality simply because you don't like the source. You are no better than what you accuse others of being: Sham, biased, partisan.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by lvoc

Schedule emails and private foreign communications are well within the authority of the SofS to classify any way he or she wishes to.

THAT claim has been debunked enough times on this board that you should know by now that it is NOT TRUE!

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by biscuitmom

A sham article from a right-wing anti-Obama and anti-Clinton rag. Nobody cares.

One day you will wake up and take off your binders.

The emails HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON TV.

"Nobody cares"

NO, DEMS DON'T CARE. "THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS"

We learned that from the dems a long time ago when a "Camelot" favorite killed a young lady and ran away.

We saw first hand how the dems don't give a damn WHAT THEIR POLITICIANS DO AS LONG AS THEY STAY IN OFFICE.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Ringo1

Judicial Watch? Nah, they are not partisan at ALL. Of course they want Hillary gone.

The answer to your question is . . never.

So, you are accusing JW of "doctoring" the emails?

You don't like them BECAUSE they show one of your heroes is a traitor and a crook and HAVE THE PROOF TO SHOW IT.

[sxrckr]

Originally Posted by biscuitmom

A sham article from a right-wing anti-Obama and anti-Clinton rag. Nobody cares.

I guess Obama's FBI must be "right wing" "anti-Clinton" too then. Because they do seem to care.

[lvoc]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

THAT claim has been debunked enough times on this board that you should know by now that it is NOT TRUE!

Only in the minds of right wing true believers. Everywhere else it is true.

[JAMS14]

Credibility and Judicial Watch don't belong in the same sentence. It's akin to a WND article about Obama's birth certificate.

Nothing to see here unless you want a laugh.

[sxrckr]

Of course statists hate Judicial Watch. How dare anyone utilize FOIA and other such methods to expose government corruption and potential criminality.

[Wanderer0101]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

THAT claim has been debunked enough times on this board that you should know by now that it is NOT TRUE!

He's a leftist. The truth is of no interest to him.