Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2016, 03:56 PM
 
1,185 posts, read 1,505,687 times
Reputation: 2297

Advertisements

Record low GDP.

Lowest wages in real terms in 50 years.

Yet, record high house prices and rents.

Can someone please explain to me how this happened?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:28 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,400,488 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockdev View Post
Record low GDP.

Lowest wages in real terms in 50 years.

Yet, record high house prices and rents.

Can someone please explain to me how this happened?


Don't you know it's all 100% the President's fault? He has complete control over the economy, the job market, governmental spending, etc. Probably the weather, too.


If we get it right this time around, it'll all be better in 4 years, don't worry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,477,534 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockdev View Post
Record low GDP.

Lowest wages in real terms in 50 years.

Yet, record high house prices and rents.

Can someone please explain to me how this happened?
Record low GDP? Nope. GDP is growing every year.

Lowest wages in real terms in 50 years? Nope.
Wage Growth Is Mediocre, but Real

Record high house prices? Nope. That was in ~2006.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:33 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,658,622 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Title speaks for itself. And he had a full 8 years too. Even Jimmy Carter was better.

Hope & Change? LOL.

SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
Your biased source titled "Obama Simply The Worst" clearly has the objective to tarnish B. Obama, and your source uses great manipulation to accomplish that goal.

GW Bush was president from 2001-2009
B. Obama was president from 2009-present

From 2004-2009 there was a huge nonstop drop in GDP. But after 2009 there was a huge increase in GDP.
United States - GDP - real growth rate - Historical Data Graphs per Year


And the following is GDP growth rates by president.

Reagan- 3.64
GHW Bush- 2.26
Clinton- 3.82
GW Bush- 1.8
Obama- 1.78

GW Bush lowered the GDP more than any of the presidents, and Obama froze GW Bush's falling GDP rates. But republicans don't mention GW Bush's huge falling GDP rates, instead they attack Obama for stabilizing GW Bush's falling GDP rates.
Which Presidents Have Been Best for the Economy? | US News

In 2008 GW Bush had a (negative) -0.92% GDP growth rate, and Bush handed that negative GDP rate to Obama. And Obama has never had a negative GDP growth rate.
US GDP Growth Rate by Year


But perhaps your sources biggest manipulation in not mentioning what causes GDP to rise and fall. Interest rates, net exports, and purchasing power cause changes in GDP rates.
Reasons for a Decrease in Real GDP | eHow

But the republicans hide GW Bush's falling GDP rates, then they attack Obama for stabilizing our falling GDP, and in the process they leave out all facts and events that cause GDP rates to fall.

Last edited by chad3; 04-28-2016 at 04:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:45 PM
 
7,580 posts, read 5,333,542 times
Reputation: 9449
Average annual growth rate.

Kennedy/Johnson 5.3%

Clinton 3.8%

Reagan 3.4%

Carter 3.4%

Nixon/Ford 2.7%

Eisenhower 2.4%

Obama 2.0%

GHW Bush 2.0%

Truman 1.9%

GW Bush 1.6%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:55 PM
 
524 posts, read 400,685 times
Reputation: 265
If we were still using the same GDP calculation from 2013 and before, it'd be significantly lower! There's been nothing but stalled "growth" for some time now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 04:59 PM
 
Location: The South
7,482 posts, read 6,269,896 times
Reputation: 13002
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Your biased source titled "Obama Simply The Worst" clearly has the objective to tarnish B. Obama, and your source uses great manipulation to accomplish that goal.

GW Bush was president from 2001-2009
B. Obama was president from 2009-present

From 2004-2009 there was a huge nonstop drop in GDP. But after 2009 there was a huge increase in GDP.
United States - GDP - real growth rate - Historical Data Graphs per Year


And the following is GDP growth rates by president.

Reagan- 3.64
GHW Bush- 2.26
Clinton- 3.82
GW Bush- 1.8
Obama- 1.78

GW Bush lowered the GDP more than any of the presidents, and Obama froze GW Bush's falling GDP rates. But republicans don't mention GW Bush's huge falling GDP rates, instead they attack Obama for stabilizing GW Bush's falling GDP rates.
Which Presidents Have Been Best for the Economy? | US News

In 2008 GW Bush had a (negative) -0.92% GDP growth rate, and Bush handed that negative GDP rate to Obama. And Obama has never had a negative GDP growth rate.
US GDP Growth Rate by Year


But perhaps your sources biggest manipulation in not mentioning what causes GDP to rise and fall. Interest rates, net exports, and purchasing power cause changes in GDP rates.
Reasons for a Decrease in Real GDP | eHow

But the republicans hide GW Bush's falling GDP rates, then they attack Obama for stabilizing our falling GDP, and in the process they leave out all facts and events that cause GDP rates to fall.
I just knew it had to be President Bush's fault. The anointed one will surely announce it any day now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,798,275 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Jeez, doesn't Obama know that the best way to goose the economy is through invasions and foreign wars? Don't worry, Cruz and Trump will get us entangled.
WE never stopped being "entangled" though cheerleaders would like to believe this is the case.

He may not have escalated, but he more than did his damage by dismantling the military and allowing what he left to fall into disrepair, exactly as Carter did. But, at least Carter had a better handle on foreign policy, which is something Obama has botched from day one. Queens toast botch, Netanyahu snub, Iran deal, Churchill bust, ISIS Jayvee... etc. showing his complete inability to do his job. Fectless

He, and we, have become the laughing stock of the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:09 PM
 
Location: A house
617 posts, read 349,555 times
Reputation: 434
obama has been the disaster that we predicted he'd be. Who's surprised?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:13 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,658,622 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockdev View Post
Record low GDP.
From 2004-2009 there was a huge nonstop drop in GDP.
United States - GDP - real growth rate - Historical Data Graphs per Year

In 2008 GW Bush had a (negative) -0.92% GDP growth rate. Bush handed that negative GDP rate to Obama, but Obama has stabilized the falling GDP.
US GDP Growth Rate by Year

Quote:
Lowest wages in real terms in 50 years.
The republicans oppose high min wages and oppose middle class tax cuts.

GOP Senators Reject Tax Cuts for Middle Class - CBS News

Quote:
Yet, record high house prices and rents.
Inflation causes home prices and rent prices to rise with time. And republicans refuse to adjust wages to inflation (their corporate leaders like to pay workers as little as possible to increase corporate profits.)

Rising Rents Outpace Wages in Wide Swaths of the U.S. - WSJ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top