Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:18 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,474 posts, read 4,074,569 times
Reputation: 4522

Advertisements

Guys thinking sheer numbers Americas GDP is bigger than it has ever been so 1.5% growth now was 5% 20 years a go and 25% 100 years ago............., since Anerica's GDP growth is probably been almost exponential since WW1 Obama's percentage might mean nothing as he may have still had he most sheer GDP growth while he was president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,235,064 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
From 2004-2009 there was a huge nonstop drop in GDP.
United States - GDP - real growth rate - Historical Data Graphs per Year

In 2008 GW Bush had a (negative) -0.92% GDP growth rate. Bush handed that negative GDP rate to Obama, but Obama has stabilized the falling GDP.
US GDP Growth Rate by Year



The republicans oppose high min wages and oppose middle class tax cuts.

GOP Senators Reject Tax Cuts for Middle Class - CBS News



Inflation causes home prices and rent prices to rise with time. And republicans refuse to adjust wages to inflation (their corporate leaders like to pay workers as little as possible to increase corporate profits.)

Rising Rents Outpace Wages in Wide Swaths of the U.S. - WSJ

Wages aren't determined by politicians.

You should write for Granma. You'd fit right in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 05:42 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post

Wages aren't determined by politicians.
"The Minimum Wage Fairness Act (S. 1737) is a bill that would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to increase the federal minimum wage for employees to $10.10 per hour over the course of a two-year period."

(Politicians were determining wages in 1938.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_Wage_Fairness_Act



But republicans oppose these bills that increase wages, and they stop the bills from passing.

Senate Republicans Block Bill to Raise Minimum Wage - WSJ

GOP blocks minimum-wage hike | TheHill

Last edited by chad3; 04-28-2016 at 06:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,235,064 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
"The Minimum Wage Fairness Act (S. 1737) is a bill that would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to increase the federal minimum wage for employees to $10.10 per hour over the course of a two-year period."

(Politicians were determining wages in 1938.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_Wage_Fairness_Act



But republicans oppose these bills that increase wages, and they stop the bills from passing.

Senate Republicans Block Bill to Raise Minimum Wage - WSJ

GOP blocks minimum-wage hike | TheHill

I'm glad they opposed it. Why should politicians be allowed to determine how much someone in the private sector gets paid? It's really none of their business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 06:36 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Reading what Obama has said in defense I believe he knows he screwed up. Why he thought the likes of Bernanke and Geithner could lead us on a path of growth and stability will always be one of life's greatest mysteries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 07:06 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Reading what Obama has said in defense I believe he knows he screwed up. Why he thought the likes of Bernanke and Geithner could lead us on a path of growth and stability will always be one of life's greatest mysteries.
Should've listened to Bernie:

Sanders Op-Ed: Bernanke Must Go
Date: Dec. 29, 2009

https://votesmart.org/public-stateme...9#.VyKxXauQLe0

"I cannot vote to confirm Ben Bernanke for another term as chairman of the Federal Reserve and have placed a hold on his nomination in the United States Senate.

The American people overwhelmingly voted last year for a change in our national priorities and for a new direction on the economy. After eight long years of trickle-down economics that benefitted millionaires and billionaires while leaving the middle class behind, Americans demanded a change that would put the interests of ordinary people ahead of the greed of Wall Street and the wealthy few.

What the American people did not bargain for was another four years for one of the key architects of the Bush economy.

Before Mr. Bernanke became the Fed chairman in 2006, he headed the Council of Economic Advisers for President George W. Bush -- one of the most conservative presidents in American history. He also sat on the Fed board of governors from 2002 to 2005. Perhaps more than anyone else, Mr. Bernanke was in a position to diagnose the impending economic disaster and take steps to stop it. Tragically, not only did he fail to prevent the worst economic collapse since the 1930s, he did not even warn the American people that it was coming until it was too late. Equally distressing, his actions since the crisis began may leave taxpayers holding the bag for an even bigger bailout in the future.

A Federal Reserve chairman has four main responsibilities: 1) to conduct monetary policy in a way that leads to maximum employment and stable prices; 2) to maintain the safety and soundness of financial institutions; 3) to contain systemic risk in financial markets; and 4) to protect consumers against deceptive and unfair financial products.

By any sober assessment, Mr. Bernanke has failed in all four of these areas. ..."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 07:12 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,286 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15644
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Title speaks for itself. And he had a full 8 years too. Even Jimmy Carter was better.

Hope & Change? LOL.

SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth

You sure about that?


US GDP Growth Rate by Year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 07:21 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
I'm glad they opposed it. Why should politicians be allowed to determine how much someone in the private sector gets paid? It's really none of their business.
Business is about (1) thing and that is profits. Business does not care about human rights or morality, and without min wage laws huge numbers of American workers would be exploited by businesses paying them unjust wages.

America passed its first min wage law in 1938, and America did just fine with those laws in place.
https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/flsa1938
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2016, 07:35 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Obama had the opportunity to rebuild the economy after the financial crash.
What could Obama have done to rebuild the economy?

Quote:
He chose to steal everything not nailed down and destroy the middle class.
What did Obama steal?

And how did Obama destroy the middle class?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top