Supreme Court Strikes Down Unconstitutional Abortion Restrictions (legal, how much, education)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Women are not just incubators for the next human life. They have lives as well, and the decision of how and when to have children is immensely important to the direction of their lives.
Plus, we already have 7 billion+ people on this planet and our population growth is bordering on unsustainable for our resources as it is.
Of course, what is the blood of an innocent compared to the inconvenience of an idiot who can't keep her legs closed when she's not sure of her birth control.
The laws imposed on these clinics was obviously a means of circumventing Roe V Wade.
So much time spent by these states trying to eliminate the symptom rather than addressing the cause, in fact many states have gone out of their way to close clinics that offer contraception and education. Rather self defeating since their focus should be the prevention of unwanted pregnancies and then abotrtions.
I don't see how the 3 dissenting justices could rationalize that this wasn't an undue burden.
Last edited by Goodnight; 06-27-2016 at 08:43 AM..
Of course, what is the blood of an innocent compared to the inconvenience of an idiot who can't keep her legs closed when she's not sure of her birth control.
Yeah, because she gets pregnant by immaculate conception, right? I note there is not a shred of responsibility put on the men in your little fantasy world. Only the women are "idiots" for not "keeping their legs closed" and getting pregnant. That pretty much tells us all we need to know about you.
Sorry that you don't get to tell women what they get to do with their bodies. That really ticks you off, doesn't it?
Your primary motivation is never about actually reducing abortions. If it were you would have been all for expanding access to birth control and comprehensive sex ed, since both of those reduce abortions. But your side is usually against those too.
No, the main motivation from your side is punishing people for sexual behavior that you disagree with. You oppose anything that would lead to enhanced sexual freedom and reduced consequences for sex outside of marriage.
Yeah, because she gets pregnant by immaculate conception, right? I note there is not a shred of responsibility put on the men in your little fantasy world. Only the women are "idiots" for not "keeping their legs closed" and getting pregnant. That pretty much tells us all we need to know about you.
Sorry that you don't get to tell women what the get to do with their bodies. That really ticks you off, doesn't it?
Good.
Unless it's rape I would say it's the woman's problem since she's the one getting pregnant. Chalk it up to her taste in men and her choices I would say.
I guess that thought process is what helps her think it's ok to kill a baby at it's most vulnerable stage when it needs it's mother the most.
And of course the idiot government enables her.
She got pregnant due to ignorance and solved the problem with abortion which is the ultimate ignorance.
Who is too stupid to use birth control. That's the way I see it. With all the birth control available only a person with a very low I. Q. would need to do the more expensive birth control.
Maybe we need some higher I.Q.'s on the court too. Then maybe they could consider the rights of the child.
Unless it's rape I would say it's the woman's problem since she's the one getting pregnant. Chalk it up to her taste in men and her choices I would say.
I guess that thought process is what helps her think it's ok to kill a baby at it's most vulnerable stage when it needs it's mother the most.
And of course the idiot government enables her.
Some of these religious charities refuse to allow abortions for minors coming across the border who have been raped, one was even a 14 year old girl. The best way to doom a girl to a lifetime of poverty and destroy the child's future is have a child while they are in their teens.
Unless it's rape I would say it's the woman's problem since she's the one getting pregnant. Chalk it up to her taste in men and her choices I would say.
I guess that thought process is what helps her think it's ok to kill a baby at it's most vulnerable stage when it needs it's mother the most.
And of course the idiot government enables her.
She got pregnant due to ignorance and solved the problem with abortion which is the ultimate ignorance.
No, it's more ignorant to bring a child into the world that you aren't prepared to raise.
In the biggest reproductive rights case since Casey, Texas law HB2 - which required that abortion providers have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles and that abortion providers adhere to the same requirements as for outpatient surgical providers.
Of course, these requirements had no purpose whatsoever other than to make providing and obtaining an abortion more expensive and more of a hassle.
Justice Breyer authored the majority opinion in the 5-3 case, which broke along predictable lines.
Republicans (I am one) were dumb to take this approach in the first place. It will cost them millions of votes.
No one ever believed the story that it was all safer this way, and the only concern is for the mother's safety.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
