Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,956,572 times
Reputation: 16466
Advertisements
Well there you have it folks. Hillary is right. If only the police and criminals have guns, then the police will know that anybody with a gun is a criminal and they can shoot them.
If we had complete gun control and confiscation and got rid of the 2nd Amendment, so that only the police have guns, then Philandro Castile would not have had a gun or right to carry and therefore he wouldn't have gotten himself shot.
I don't see any downside to this. I mean what other options are there?
Well there you have it folks. Hillary is right. If only the police and criminals have guns, then the police will know that anybody with a gun is a criminal and they can shoot them.
If we had complete gun control and confiscation and got rid of the 2nd Amendment, so that only the police have guns, then Philandro Castile would not have had a gun or right to carry and therefore he wouldn't have gotten himself shot.
I don't see any downside to this. I mean what other options are there?
No, taking away guns from law abiding will benefit criminals and before any judges wait for the facts. This could be a terrorist act.
If some had a CCW in the area they could of came to the aid of the down officers.
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,956,572 times
Reputation: 16466
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ
No, taking away guns from law abiding will benefit criminals and before any judges wait for the facts. This could be a terrorist act.
If some had a CCW in the area they could of came to the aid of the down officers.
Ah, but if there was gun confiscation then the Dallas shooting tonight couldn't have occurred. And if there had been people with guns the cops would have shot them because they would be criminals.
Well there you have it folks. Hillary is right. If only the police and criminals have guns, then the police will know that anybody with a gun is a criminal and they can shoot them.
If we had complete gun control and confiscation and got rid of the 2nd Amendment, so that only the police have guns, then Philandro Castile would not have had a gun or right to carry and therefore he wouldn't have gotten himself shot.
I don't see any downside to this. I mean what other options are there?
Another one of your non-sensible gun grabber threads.
Well there you have it folks. Hillary is right. If only the police and criminals have guns, then the police will know that anybody with a gun is a criminal and they can shoot them.
If we had complete gun control and confiscation and got rid of the 2nd Amendment, so that only the police have guns, then Philandro Castile would not have had a gun or right to carry and therefore he wouldn't have gotten himself shot.
I don't see any downside to this. I mean what other options are there?
Just cleaned my newest AR this afternoon. Will be going to the range tomorrow to break it in.
Ah, but if there was gun confiscation then the Dallas shooting tonight couldn't have occurred. And if there had been people with guns the cops would have shot them because they would be criminals.
Not when Clear aid would of been given. Who knows this could of been resolved very quickly. If citizens gave aid and support to these Officers.
For a the Record a Officer lost his life tonight. We should pray for the Family!
This is why we most not tolerate Thugs!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.