Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2016, 04:48 PM
 
2,055 posts, read 1,450,369 times
Reputation: 2106

Advertisements

The third party bit has me confused. I can see how a third party would definately affect the woman person because of Bernie ... they now have a new home. But its effect on The Donald has to be minimal. The issue of the R party fracture is overblown. Jeb, Ted, and the rest only represent the establishment ... which is what The Donald is against ... just like Bernie used to be. Consider how large the anti-establishment electorate (proven by voter turn out) and then it becomes a question of who will be left standing. The woman person's speech was so captivating that even Bubba fell asleep. And all the verbal fallecio she got leading up to this flop speech did nothing. Even the WH moslem mentioned himself 119 times. Demo party unity is almost an oxymoron. Is the R party really splintered? How many R groups are marching against The Donald? I kinda hope Johnson gets his 15%. Most of those will be the one's Bernie threw under the bus.

We need more 3rd parties.

El Nox
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2016, 05:20 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,972,657 times
Reputation: 6059
Bernie Sanders is about taking on the most powerful special interests in the country and reforming the economy which is rigged through a corrupt system of campaign finance. The establishment is the big money donor class and their puppets buying elections. The only way to change this is to fight for publicly funded elections. Donald Trump wants to do the opposite. Open all floodgates for the super rich to buy politicians, through his Supreme Court picks, which makes it impossible to win office without being super rich or the puppet of the super rich.

What's so great about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2016, 06:13 PM
 
593 posts, read 1,379,155 times
Reputation: 395
Third parties have never worked or been successful in American politics. The two major parties have never been totally different in terms of the economy, different approaches to foriegn policy and social issues certainly. Traditionally both are center or middle of the road parties esp. ONCE the general elections begin.

If you notice, during the primaries politicians on both sides go state to state and say different things pandering to everyone for votes and financial support. They promise everyone the moon. BUT, when the general election starts they begin the move to center. In doing this, they effectively isolate third parties to the left or right.

The real problem with third parties is: they absorb votes from either the Democratic or Republican candidate and can adversely effect the presidential outcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2016, 10:08 PM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,288,815 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Homeboy View Post
Third parties have never worked or been successful in American politics. The two major parties have never been totally different in terms of the economy, different approaches to foriegn policy and social issues certainly. Traditionally both are center or middle of the road parties esp. ONCE the general elections begin.

If you notice, during the primaries politicians on both sides go state to state and say different things pandering to everyone for votes and financial support. They promise everyone the moon. BUT, when the general election starts they begin the move to center. In doing this, they effectively isolate third parties to the left or right.

The real problem with third parties is: they absorb votes from either the Democratic or Republican candidate and can adversely effect the presidential outcome.
Well that is just false, at one point in time there were several parties, since our 14th President, not counting the National Union party, there were various parties competing. Since then, we have seen a rise in the two parties taking dominance in the elections and basically turning this country into a two party system. Though with rising dissatisfaction with the two party system, I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more from the Green Party and the Libertarian Party.

I know in Oregon, the Libertarian Party fared better than the Republicans in a number of elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2016, 10:20 PM
 
593 posts, read 1,379,155 times
Reputation: 395
They might win local elections but they have never taken a presidential election. That was my argument.

Third fourth or fifteenth parties dont work in America where a majority (greater than 50%) vote is needed to get elected!

They do work in European countries because they only need a plurality of the vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2016, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,388,627 times
Reputation: 14459
Aren't two crooks good enough for you people?

This is the equivalent of having people interview to burglarize your home.

"Burglar #1, do you promise to only break a window to get into my house and rob it if the front door is locked? You do?! Great! I'll vote for you!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2016, 11:41 PM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,288,815 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX Homeboy View Post
They might win local elections but they have never taken a presidential election. That was my argument.

Third fourth or fifteenth parties dont work in America where a majority (greater than 50%) vote is needed to get elected!

They do work in European countries because they only need a plurality of the vote.
I just proved that to be false, at one time, we had more than two parties running and it wasn't the Democrats and Republicans.

In the US, you don't need to get more than 50% of the vote to win. You need to get to 270 electoral votes to win. Clinton in 1992 only got 43% of the vote, but won 370 electoral votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2016, 12:46 AM
 
6,977 posts, read 5,714,453 times
Reputation: 5177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
I just proved that to be false, at one time, we had more than two parties running and it wasn't the Democrats and Republicans.

In the US, you don't need to get more than 50% of the vote to win. You need to get to 270 electoral votes to win. Clinton in 1992 only got 43% of the vote, but won 370 electoral votes.
we had '17 parties' running just on the republican side alone. if you were sitting at home on april 5th watching the ncaa basketball march madness final game, would you say "we need more than 2 teams"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2016, 01:16 AM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,288,815 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by wall st kid View Post
we had '17 parties' running just on the republican side alone. if you were sitting at home on april 5th watching the ncaa basketball march madness final game, would you say "we need more than 2 teams"?
You had 17 candidates within one party, that isn't the same as 17 parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2016, 07:21 AM
 
593 posts, read 1,379,155 times
Reputation: 395
Cliftopdx
In the US, you don't need to get more than 50% of the vote to win. You need to get to 270 electoral votes to win. Clinton in 1992 only got 43% of the vote, but won 370 electoral votes.


270 out of 535 electoral votes IS a majority of the vote!
Do you need a graphing calculator?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top