Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-03-2016, 08:20 AM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,496,886 times
Reputation: 3981

Advertisements

Fox claimed while all of the networks covered the Khan speech at the DNC almost none covered the Pat Smith one at the RNC. Turns out the only network that did not cover Pat Smith speech was none other than Fox.

Wrong: Fox News anchor says networks covered Khizr Khan but skipped Patricia Smith | PunditFact
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2016, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacoder View Post
fox claimed while all of the networks covered the khan speech at the dnc almost none covered the pat smith one at the rnc. Turns out the only network that did not cover pat smith speech was none other than fox.

wrong: Fox news anchor says networks covered khizr khan but skipped patricia smith | punditfact
too good!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2016, 08:25 AM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,555,388 times
Reputation: 4471
The reason Khan got so much coverage was because of Trump's asinine comments afterwards. If he left it alone, there would be no coverage. I cannot stand HRC but she is right - he can be so easily baited.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2016, 09:36 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,305,141 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeastah View Post
The reason Khan got so much coverage was because of Trump's asinine comments afterwards. If he left it alone, there would be no coverage. I cannot stand HRC but she is right - he can be so easily baited.
Questions about his mental health are being raised. Perhaps all candidates for POTUS should be so screened? (Or we could go The Dead Zone route?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top