Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You guys have been hurling everything you could think of, fact and fiction and everything inbetween, at Hillary for well over a decade. Each time confidently declaring that this time, this time for sure, this will be it, you have the silver bullet.
You guys have been hurling everything you could think of, fact and fiction and everything inbetween, at Hillary for well over a decade. Each time confidently declaring that this time, this time for sure, this will be it, you have the silver bullet.
It's getting a bit like a Roadrunner cartoon.
Or Charlie Brown kicking that football. Or Elmer Fudd shooting that rascally wabbit.
1. She isn't wearing a hijab in half of her public photos.
2. She married a Jew
3. She married a Jew
4. Let's not forget she married a Jew.
The average Muslim doesn't think to well of Jews specifically Israel because of Palestine. Radicals want to kill all the Jews yet she is married and had a child with a Jew, she would get killed by radicals yet she supposedly worked with them?
I would like all of the posters who think this is some kind of a deal-breaker for Clinton to respond to NigerianNightmare's post. It seems to me this is exactly the type of Muslim who would be acceptable to the right--an American Muslim married to a Jewish man. You can't ask for any more proof that she isn't a radical Muslim than that. I would be interested in hearing why that isn't so.
Or is it true that any Muslim, no matter what, is just bad, bad, bad? That's kind of what Trump has been insinuating, and what you all have been vigorously denying, but it seems maybe it's true after all.
I would like all of the posters who think this is some kind of a deal-breaker for Clinton to respond to NigerianNightmare's post. It seems to me this is exactly the type of Muslim who would be acceptable to the right--an American Muslim married to a Jewish man. You can't ask for any more proof that she isn't a radical Muslim than that. I would be interested in hearing why that isn't so.
Or is it true that any Muslim, no matter what, is just bad, bad, bad? That's kind of what Trump has been insinuating, and what you all have been vigorously denying, but it seems maybe it's true after all.
Let's just say they couldn't pass the extreme vetting Trump proposes. They would fail the respect for other religion question. They would most likely fail a homosexual rights question too. I say extreme vet them. If they can't pass, deport them somewhere else.
But it's hard to believe that she is some sort of an extremist. I mean, use your brains, people.
1. She goes around in very modern fashion...do you see a burqa or hijab on her anywhere?
2. She has spent her career working for a non-Muslim who is an aggressive pursuer of female rights; not to mention currently trying to make history as the first female President in this country.
3. She is married to a JEW, for God's sake.
Does this sound to you like someone with a strict "women should cover up and stay at home" mindset?
The very first line of your post is all the cult needs to hear. I doubt any of them will read any further. They want to pretend that they don't demonize every Muslim, only the radical ones, but their responses in this thread prove that is a lie.
She is a Muslim. Muslim=BAD! End of story.
Yes, unable to differentiate to any degree 1.6 billion worldwide adherents to some form of Islam.
And then conservatives act all indignant when someone points out that they are the very definition of bigotry.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.