Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-19-2016, 02:36 PM
 
9,909 posts, read 7,692,561 times
Reputation: 2494

Advertisements

Not a President. What if one house of Congress writes bills and then approve it. Once approved goes to the Second House of Congress that is ruled by 2 major parties and 3 minor parties. The 5 party members elect one member from their party to represent them as Leader of the Houses and Court. These 5 individuals are then elected by the people via a popular vote.

What do you think the US be like if this was the current system?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2016, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,772 posts, read 6,379,741 times
Reputation: 15775
Canada has a parliamentary govt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,354,720 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunD1987 View Post
Not a President. What if one house of Congress writes bills and then approve it. Once approved goes to the Second House of Congress that is ruled by 2 major parties and 3 minor parties. The 5 party members elect one member from their party to represent them as Leader of the Houses and Court. These 5 individuals are then elected by the people via a popular vote.

What do you think the US be like if this was the current system?
Sort of like playing '50 shades of slavery'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,438,954 times
Reputation: 13809
Sounds revolting!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 10:12 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,605,811 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunD1987 View Post
Not a President. What if one house of Congress writes bills and then approve it. Once approved goes to the Second House of Congress that is ruled by 2 major parties and 3 minor parties. The 5 party members elect one member from their party to represent them as Leader of the Houses and Court. These 5 individuals are then elected by the people via a popular vote.

What do you think the US be like if this was the current system?

When we fought the British for Independence, Britain had a Parliament that was very similar to what they have today. That was the reason we went to war. They were taxing the colonies and the colonies had no say in anything(no representation in Parliament.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,213 posts, read 22,351,209 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunD1987 View Post
Not a President. What if one house of Congress writes bills and then approve it. Once approved goes to the Second House of Congress that is ruled by 2 major parties and 3 minor parties. The 5 party members elect one member from their party to represent them as Leader of the Houses and Court. These 5 individuals are then elected by the people via a popular vote.

What do you think the US be like if this was the current system?
These "what if?" questions are always nothing but a waste of pixels.

There is simply no way to create an alternate political history that spans 250 years. There are too many ways to spin all the alternatives to make the question valid in any way.

When the United States won it's independence, we chose a different form of democracy than that of our former motherland. No one can ever adequately answer this 'what if?' because so much time has passed since then. The United States has no experience as a nation with the parliamentary system at all.

The only thing in it that we use is their rules of order, but those rules are older than the British Parliament. They go all the way back to the Roman republic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Canada
7,677 posts, read 5,524,010 times
Reputation: 8817
I just wanted to point out that that the opening post describes is NOT how any parliamentary system of government that I've ever heard of works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 10:01 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,481,679 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
Canada has a parliamentary govt.
But not like the one described by the O/P.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top