Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's the best you can do, blame the NY times? Had Orange man offered a tax plan that would have restored some degree of fairness he would be able to walk away from this unscathed, but what did he do? He doubled down on tax breaks for the wealthy. That is the crux of the problem, the NY times didn't do this to him, he did it to himself, it's just another unforced error on his part.
So.... the NYT is only going after his taxes because.... they don't like his tax plan?
LOL! Uh... No.
They are going after him because he isn't Hillary.
And stop pretending the NYT is some neutral bystander. They are far Left and completely in the tank for Hillary. They own this.
NY Times made a net profit of $3,500,000 in federal income taxes in 2014.
Is it hypocritical to blast one entity for doing it, while doing it yourself?
Let's be clear: They are not "loopholes." They are legitimate tax saving methods that are part of the tax laws passed by Congress, which both Democrats and Republicans voted for. If they were "loopholes," they would have changed the laws by now to eliminate them.
Calling them "loopholes" serves people like Hillary who use the term to smear their opponents. Do you seriously think Bill and Hillary have not used every tax saving strategy in the law to minimize their taxes? Or do you think Bill and Hillary pay more than they owe out of the kindness of their hearts, because they think they should, in order to help pay for the welfare state that they created? I don't think Bill and Hillary are that generous.
That's the best you can do, blame the NY times? Had Orange man offered a tax plan that would have restored some degree of fairness he would be able to walk away from this unscathed, but what did he do? He doubled down on tax breaks for the wealthy. That is the crux of the problem, the NY times didn't do this to him, he did it to himself, it's just another unforced error on his part.
So despite the fact that I have shown you in another thread that Trump's tax plan is better for the lower income you are still going to spout misinformation?
Anyone who uses any pejorative, like say Orange Man, in discussing a candidate or their proposals is not to be taken seriously. Doubtful that person in a position to either pay taxes, or use any type of deduction, tax credit, or carry over. Appreciate your trying, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster
So.... the NYT is only going after his taxes because.... they don't like his tax plan?
LOL! Uh... No.
They are going after him because he isn't Hillary.
And stop pretending the NYT is some neutral bystander. They are far Left and completely in the tank for Hillary. They own this.
I was thinking same they not puffing about taxes on the campaign n promising what he does not do himself.. Big difference
Hard to tell what your point is in this post. Even still, it's hypocritical to condemn one person/business for taking advantage of a tax loophole, and make excuses for someone else to do so.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary is still corrupt!
Hillary is not fun
