Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I can't stand the Hypocracy and the lies of the Obama/Hillary legacy: from thier role in deposing Khadafi to Asaad, to trading Terrorist for Traitors, or going back in Iraq or the lies around O-care. As a Independent I could never vote for these frauds, but Cruz could not get me to come out for the vote.
I never understood the ignorance concerning Cruz. Him and Rand Paul are the closest to Constitution based governance of any of the candidates. They both have very clear records that showed this to be the case and yet... most people believed the media garbage put out about them. It was the same with Ron Paul, the media attacked and the people chose to be ignorant and believe.
Then again, nobody cares about the Constitution anyway, so... /shrug
Rand is my guy and has been from the start! Now... I can only vote for Johnson, which the establishment is trying their best to discredit and defame. He was a very good governor and would make a very good President, unlike the criminal and billionaire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun
I can't stand the Hypocracy and the lies of the Obama/Hillary legacy: from thier role in deposing Khadafi to Asaad, to trading Terrorist for Traitors, or going back in Iraq or the lies around O-care. As a Independent I could never vote for these frauds, but Cruz could not get me to come out for the vote.
They have done more to damage the US than anyone seems to realize. The cheerleaders are showing how low information voters control this Republic.
Could CNBC and CNN be anymore transparent on their so-called unbiased debates? I'm not a Trump fan, but he is absolutely correct when he says the system is rigged
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812
Well, as they say, every rose has its thorns. Or in Hilary's case not every thorn has a rose.
There is nothing good about this election. We have a candidate who is probably the only one who could lose to the criminal. We are being played.
I think to be correct, your title should read, "Would Cruz have.. " not "Would Cruz of..." Maybe English isn't your first language ... or maybe they aren't teaching English in school anymore.
I certainly think so. I was/am a huge Ted Cruz supporter. I think that Ted is without question the most qualified candidate we've seen in a long time. His knowledge of the constitution and the limits of the executive branch, his judgment on Obamacare, and his passion for principled conservative values are things this country needs right now.
But pragmatically speaking, Clinton is a deeply flawed candidate with a horrendous record. Cruz would have no trouble in debates with her. It would be entertaining to watch.
Cruz would have been a single-issue, anti-LGBT candidate. Evangelicals would have loved him, but he would had just as difficult of a time uniting the party as Trump has. The one thing I can say though is Cruz would have been more likely to put Hillary on the defense.
Kasich would have been the answer for the GOP this election cycle, but he wasn't xenophobic or homophobic enough to make it through the primaries.
By the way, it's "have". Would Cruz HAVE beaten Hillary. Not 'of'.
My answer is still: No.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
