Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:02 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Well what do you expect when doctors are making $200-$300k/year and hospital and health insurance company executives are making $1mil plus/year, that their product will be cheap? This is why health care should be single payer!!!
As a primary care doc I make about 3% of the total HC costs of my Medicare patients.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,592,213 times
Reputation: 8925
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgustav View Post
***What first world nation has nationalized health care and/or college successfully?*** It hasn't worked well in Canada for health care.

The Left is often looking at the Scandinavian countries as a utopian model to follow. Look at the tax rate workers in Scandinavian countries pay for nationalized health care and free college. Somebody has to pay for it. Look at the well paid pro athletes in these countries, they often move to Monaco or another lower tax country for their residency.
Health insurance. Most of them have and yes it has worked. Further the VAST majority of Canadians when asked, do not want US style health care to the tune of 86%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...rance_coverage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...mortality_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ife_expectancy

Note Im not for free college (or free health care. Im for payroll tax (Yes first dollar and zero deduction) both employer and employee universal health insurance with a fairly robust deductible (Literally zero until say 2500 individual/ 5000 family has been reached.) The private sector can offer gap insurance for those who want first dollar coverage Think of it as actual insurance against 50,000 dollar bills. No more opacity in pricing. E room doctors in in-network hospitals have to be in- network. Same with Anesthesiologists. If they do not want to participate in networks, that is fine but is is ridiculous to allow surprise bills from in-network institutions.

Our universities are in desperate need of reform and the need for college is completely predictable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:05 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgustav View Post
To preview 2017 rates in the Covered CA site, you need to use Shop and Compare tab and put in 2017 to get an estimate.

For single coverage under Silver HMO, I had $1640 per month in Yavapai County AZ, CA was $760 per month. For the guy who is suggesting single payer, how is adding more government into healthcare going to fix this? We just need to vote against any Democrat on the ballot this year.
Something is not right. One person? My wife has serious disease, no subsidies, and her GOLD is $872 in Yavapi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:07 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Single payer IS better, because one, the government doesn't need the overhead or profit margin of private business, and two (and this is the big one), even with insurance, you can still be billed tens of thousands of dollars that you don't have if you do need to go to the hospital, where you pay NOTHING out of pocket with single payer, just add in a 10% National Sales Tax like Canada to fund it, most people would find it cheaper than having to shell out hundreds per month in premiums for private insurance
We can't know the details of any future American single payer plan, or if there will ever be one. I would imagine that it would be means tested. And there would be premiums, co-pays and deductibles. And maybe more taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:08 AM
 
706 posts, read 1,309,098 times
Reputation: 369
If the Tea Party crazies hadn't blocked alternate proposals, we might have a sound national system we can all live with....but alas...35% of this country is full of lunatics, many of which are descendants of George Wallace supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:09 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Single payer IS better, because one, the government doesn't need the overhead or profit margin of private business, and two (and this is the big one), even with insurance, you can still be billed tens of thousands of dollars that you don't have if you do need to go to the hospital, where you pay NOTHING out of pocket with single payer, just add in a 10% National Sales Tax like Canada to fund it, most people would find it cheaper than having to shell out hundreds per month in premiums for private insurance
Did you ever have to deal with medicare or medicaid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:11 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
Democrats take note:

Every single thing the Republicans warned would go wrong with Obamacare, did go wrong.....

And everything the Democrats told us (lower rates, you can keep your same plan, etc) was not true? Hmmmm ....

Maybe the Ds were right in saying Americans are so stupid they can get away with it.
Stupidity is voting for more of it.

Every single thing the Republicans warned would go wrong with Obamacare, did go wrong..... And everything the Democrats told us (lower rates, you can keep your same plan, etc) was not true
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:14 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,011,790 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
So why is it working in Europe and Israel? I lived there for more than 25 years, and it works very well.
Does it REALLY now? Hmmm...
From an article written 9 years ago:

My health-care prejudices crumbled not in the classroom but on the way to one. On a subzero Winnipeg morning in 1997, I cut across the hospital emergency room to shave a few minutes off my frigid commute. Swinging open the door, I stepped into a nightmare: the ER overflowed with elderly people on stretchers, waiting for admission. Some, it turned out, had waited five days. The air stank with sweat and urine. Right then, I began to reconsider everything that I thought I knew about Canadian health care. I soon discovered that the problems went well beyond overcrowded ERs. Patients had to wait for practically any diagnostic test or procedure, such as the man with persistent pain from a hernia operation whom we referred to a pain clinic—with a three-year wait list; or the woman needing a sleep study to diagnose what seemed like sleep apnea, who faced a two-year delay; or the woman with breast cancer who needed to wait four months for radiation therapy, when the standard of care was four weeks.


Nor were the problems I identified unique to Canada—they characterized all government-run health-care systems. Consider the recent British controversy over a cancer patient who tried to get an appointment with a specialist, only to have it canceled—48 times. More than 1 million Britons must wait for some type of care, with 200,000 in line for longer than six months. A while back, I toured a public hospital in Washington, D.C., with Tim Evans, a senior fellow at the Centre for the New Europe. The hospital was dark and dingy, but Evans observed that it was cleaner than anything in his native England. In France, the supply of doctors is so limited that during an August 2003 heat wave—when many doctors were on vacation and hospitals were stretched beyond capacity—15,000 elderly citizens died. Across Europe, state-of-the-art drugs aren’t available. And so on.

The Ugly Truth About Canadian Health Care | City Journal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:15 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Would you stop spreading false info about Canada's healthcare system? I already gave my example of dual citizens I knew for years who would drive to Canada ANY time they needed to see a doctor/dentist/optometrist. So it's working for them. And all you say about paying more taxes, if you aren't having to shell out for premiums or out of pocket copays and deductibles, it more than works out in the end

The Canadians who come here for healthcare, are usually part of Canada's top 5%, so they can afford to drop $30-$50k out of pocket, where 95% of people CAN'T!
Dual citizenship yet you live here and use our healthcare services. You might be dead before you get services in Canada.

Why don't you go live in Canada, it sounds like it's more to your liking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 09:18 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by mash123 View Post
When people are loosing their homes and cannot pay back other debts because of huge medical bills, we all pay for it. When people are dying at 40 from a preventable illness and leaving 3 orphans because they don't have insurance and don't go to doctors, we all paying for their needs. When people became disable because a simple flu gets complicated, we all pay for it.
So your liberty is hitting my liberty not to pay more taxes.
Just Stop. My elderly mother depends on Medicare and it doesn't take care of much. Of course she is shut out by the other government healthcare program meant only for deadbeats because she worked. And with all her medical issues and bills you know what's also killing her. Her real estate taxes.

I've been dealing with the mess for years and let me tell you, government healthcare is NOT the answer. It's so convoluted you need a full time secretary to deal with the paperwork for very little in return. It's a fricken nightmare.

So just stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top