Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751
Another thing I don't understand is that the DNC rigged the primary for Clintons benefit. Why would Sanders voters vote for someone that did that to their choice candidate?
Because I'm not a conservative/libertarian and never will be, I won't vote for that
Another thing I don't understand is that the DNC rigged the primary for Clintons benefit. Why would Sanders voters vote for someone that did that to their choice candidate?
I imagine that a political organization is political and practices politics. None of this surprises me. I guess seeing it in black and white might educate more people.
I hear you. But then we would have to change Medicare.
We need to meet two generalities IMO.
We need a system that covers those with pre-existing and seniors. i.e. high risk, expensive.
And we need a system that covers the relatively young and healthy. Low risk and cheap.
These can be met with a public option. The privates could now cover the latter, as so many high risks would be removed from their regions.
No, it is not the authority of the federal government to do such (it is not a listed power in the Constitution and remember, if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution it is left to the states and the people there in). They are illegal in such actions. This is a matter for the states, not the federal government.
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Another thing I don't understand is that the DNC rigged the primary for Clintons benefit. Why would Sanders voters vote for someone that did that to their choice candidate?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220
Because I'm not a conservative/libertarian and never will be, I won't vote for that
I didn't ask why you won't vote for Trump. I asked why you would vote for a candidate that rigged it against your candidate Bernie? Can you explain? If a candidate did what was done against Bernie to get Hillary elected I certainly wouldn't be voting for her.
No, it is not the authority of the federal government to do such (it is not a listed power in the Constitution and remember, if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution it is left to the states and the people there in). They are illegal in such actions. This is a matter for the states, not the federal government.
What would you suggest that I do with my Medicare premium next month?
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751
I didn't ask why you won't vote for Trump. I asked why you would vote for a candidate that rigged it against your candidate Bernie? Can you explain? If a candidate did what was done against Bernie to get Hillary elected I certainly wouldn't be voting for her.
Because of the "Nader effect". Almost nobody votes third party, so if I voted for Jill Stein, I would be defacto giving Trump my vote by taking a vote away from Hillary. I don't want this to be another 2000 election, where Ralph Nader, Katherine Harris, and the Supreme Court all cost Gore the election
Because of the "Nader effect". Almost nobody votes third party, so if I voted for Jill Stein, I would be defacto giving Trump my vote by taking a vote away from Hillary. I don't want this to be another 2000 election, where Ralph Nader, Katherine Harris, and the Supreme Court all cost Gore the election
You could have posted things you think Hillary will do that benefits Americans. Instead you're voting for Hillary, (who made sure you're candidate didn't win by cheating) as an anti-Trump vote. You do realize that you're doing exactly what they expect you to do right? LOL, you're being played. and you thought you were smart lol
Because of the "Nader effect". Almost nobody votes third party, so if I voted for Jill Stein, I would be defacto giving Trump my vote by taking a vote away from Hillary. I don't want this to be another 2000 election, where Ralph Nader, Katherine Harris, and the Supreme Court all cost Gore the election
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
and you thought you were smart lol
