Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
4,750 posts, read 3,571,556 times
Reputation: 4614

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
OP, in four years, Rice will be 66 and in eight she'll be 70. Clinton is 69 and Trump is 70. Why would Rice probably be out?
I wouldn't be against it. Some complained about both candidates advanced ages this year, but Rice does look better/healthier than either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:21 PM
 
10,245 posts, read 6,335,303 times
Reputation: 11298
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
If Condoleeza Rice had ever run, I think she'd win it. But you're right. At 62 years old, she'd be 70 years old minimum before she could ever run. Elizabeth Warren is even older at 67 years old. If she ran in 2020, she'd be 71 years old. Again, probably to old.

Nikki Haley is a strong possibility. We'll see where her career takes her.

I get the strong sense that whenever a woman can actually win the GOP nomination, she'll be hard to beat in the General Election. If that woman happens to be Hispanic or black, then it'd be amazing and virtually unbeatable. My prediction: The first female POTUS will be a Republican.
Donald Trump is 70. Why isn't he too old? Only applies to women who "how could anyone vote for a face like that?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:21 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,102,593 times
Reputation: 17865
I would love to see Condi Rice as President but I wouldn't be voting for her because she is a female. I'd be voting for her because she is an extremely intelligent person highly qualified for the job. Based on her statements it doesn't look like I'll have a chance.

Because of Clinton's potential legal troubles it's just another bonus that she wasn't elected. It would be a travesty to have the first woman President under indictment. There is plenty of very intelligent and qualified women for the job, one of them will ascend to the position soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,746,317 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
OP, in four years, Rice will be 66 and in eight she'll be 70. Clinton is 69 and Trump is 70. Why would Rice probably be out?
It'd be awesome to see!!

The math doesn't work for her to run in 2020 though. That'd be Trump's re-election year. Even Jimmy Carter had one of those, so don't count on Trump just dropping out after one term. But a 70 year old Condi could be quite interesting.

I just get the feeling that she won't actually run though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:23 PM
 
1,710 posts, read 1,465,274 times
Reputation: 2205
Ivanka!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:23 PM
 
Location: USA
31,077 posts, read 22,126,772 times
Reputation: 19104
Quote:
Originally Posted by fisheye View Post
Judge Jeanine!
Omg, she is wild in a good way

Im hoping a Janet Brewer/Palin ticket
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,746,317 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jo48 View Post
Donald Trump is 70. Why isn't he too old? Only applies to women who "how could anyone vote for a face like that?"
LOL, agreed what was I thinking??

That said I didn't vote for Trump or Hillary. Gary Johnson is 63 and I voted for him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
4,750 posts, read 3,571,556 times
Reputation: 4614
Quote:
Originally Posted by behindthescreen View Post
Next, they need to let non natural born citizens become president because it's RACIST!!!
We get it - - you don't think women can be president. Can you now allow the rest of us to have a conversation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,247 posts, read 27,650,711 times
Reputation: 16083
She has to be like Margaret Thatcher.

I can't find any in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2016, 02:27 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,964,429 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Not to encourage you statists with your voting and your paved roads and whatnot

But

Speaking as someone who can at least appreciate the fact that you folks consider being president a job why in the world does it matter who does the job as long as they are the best one for it?

I never care who cuts my hair, puts the breaks on my car, or who cleans my teeth as long as they are the most qualified person I can find.

My obsession is with qualifications and ability not what's under your dress/pants/kilt/etc.

It seems the founding fathers deemed it necessary and was made law. It worked well through time until the politically correct liberals feel they have to change everything this country was founded on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top