What are your preferences on "anchor babies" (constitution, single, country)

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by westcoastforme

Again....

PC policy

The globalist politicians have forgotten or don't care that "subject to the jurisdiction" means here legally..

Not "foreigners, aliens, and children of ambassadors" as Jacob Howard stated

The best part is he says "it's in the Constitution" and then instead of quoting the Constitution, he quotes Wikipedia, which cites a Hispanic (illegal) immigration group.

[Ceece]

I'd be happy for SCOUTS to revisit the issue and find that, opps, we shouldn't have been granting birthright citizenship to people willy-nilly.

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by leftee

Let's = let us ... kinda like when you buttercups say "Don't mess with us".

You think I'm a buttercup? That's sweet.

BTW, "us" includes "you" as used.

us Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by Ceece

I'd be happy for SCOUTS to revisit the issue and find that, opps, we shouldn't have been granting birthright citizenship to people willy-nilly.

There's nothing to prevent it that I'm aware of.

Would you like the Court to make the revocation of birthright citizenship retroactive?

[Soup Not See]

Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa

You think I'm a buttercup? That's sweet.

BTW, "us" includes "you" as used.

us Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary

No, I think you're a typical liberal baiting poster that asks a lot of questions, but doesn't answer too many.

What is your preference on anchor babies ?

[theunbrainwashed]

Originally Posted by Kaphawoman

They're not Americans. They need to go home with mom and dad. I don't know about other countries, but Mexico considers children born abroad to Mexicans to be Mexican citizens too.

The US does the same. This isn't something unique to Mexico. They also have birthright citizenship too

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by njquestions

The best part is he says "it's in the Constitution" and then instead of quoting the Constitution, he quotes Wikipedia, which cites a Hispanic (illegal) immigration group.

Wikipedia cites the text of the Fourteenth as ratified, and cites case law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourte...s_Constitution

Unless you think the US Supreme Court has been a Hispanic (illegal) immigration group for over a century, that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthr...Court_case_law

See?

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed

The US does the same. This isn't something unique to Mexico. They also have birthright citizenship too

They also kick out everyone in their country who tries to cross their borders. You keep trying to avoid that little fact.

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by leftee

No, I think you're a typical liberal baiting poster that asks a lot of questions, but doesn't answer too many.

Your opinion is noted, and I will certainly give it all the consideration it merits.

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa

Wikipedia cites the text of the Fourteenth as ratified, and cites case law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourte...s_Constitution

Unless you think the US Supreme Court has been a Hispanic (illegal) immigration group for over a century, that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthr...Court_case_law

See?

Did you guys know that the Constitution is Wikipedia? I didn't, either. "It's in the Constitution! Look at Wikipedia and it will tell you!" Oh, uh ...couldn't you just show me the Constitution? "I am! Look, here is its Wikipedia page!!" OK ...what about in the Constitution? "Look, here is La Raza discussing the issue on Wikipedia!!"