Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wouldn't worry about it unless you live there. The state and a few others like Illinois are doomed. Many with nice fixed income retirements will almost assuredly leave for other tax friendly states to their liking.
That's actually the problem.
Liberals vote for liberalism. Then it destroys the state. So then they flee the state. But since liberals can never learn from their mistakes, they then start voting for liberalism in the state they fled to. The liberals who have pensions, for example, do indeed flee to states where they get to keep more money. But it's not like they say "my eyes are opened to the injustice I am forcing on the citizens who support my non-working!" They actually become crazily more certain that they were right and start demanding pensions in their new state while they don't work for 30 years.
Oddly, that's not West Virginia. Also, by the way, you should try swimming in the Hudson River, where liberalism and government have made the water pristine.
Oddly, that's not West Virginia. Also, by the way, you should try swimming in the Hudson River, where liberalism and government have made the water pristine.
You're right. That was not West Virginia. That wasn't my point. No worries.
The Hudson River was terribly polluted by capitalism or General Electric - who dumped millions of pounds of pollution into that river until the late 1970's. It took "liberalism" to clean it up. BTW, NYC and SF are bastions of capitalism and huge generators of capital. It appears that is something you do not understand. Silly...
You're right. That was not West Virginia. That wasn't my point. No worries.
The Hudson River was terribly polluted by capitalism or General Electric - who dumped millions of pounds of pollution into that river until the late 1970's. It took "liberalism" to clean it up. BTW, NYC and SF are bastions of capitalism and huge generators of capital. It appears that is something you do not understand. Silly...
Liberalism cleaned it up? You should go swim there then, since liberalism cleaned it up. Also, it's irrelevant to claim that "capitalism" polluted it, since it was liberals practicing capitalism. By the way, since liberalism depends on the money of capitalism, I could also claim credit for anything you say liberalism did. It's strange that I don't understand, but understand more than you do.
Liberalism cleaned it up? You should go swim there then, since liberalism cleaned it up. Also, it's irrelevant to claim that "capitalism" polluted it, since it was liberals practicing capitalism. By the way, since liberalism depends on the money of capitalism, I could also claim credit for anything you say liberalism did. It's strange that I don't understand, but understand more than you do.
Liberalism cleaned it up? You should go swim there then, since liberalism cleaned it up. Also, it's irrelevant to claim that "capitalism" polluted it, since it was liberals practicing capitalism. By the way, since liberalism depends on the money of capitalism, I could also claim credit for anything you say liberalism did. It's strange that I don't understand, but understand more than you do.
So are liberals the one who practice capitalism or do they advocate for "wealth distribution"? Seems like I see people arguing both of these!
So are liberals the one who practice capitalism or do they advocate for "wealth distribution"? Seems like I see people arguing both of these!
They advocate for wealth distribution. However, nobody claimed that liberals aren't giant hypocrites. So, for example, the same liberals who are socialists happen to be extremely wealthy. If I point that out, you might say "oh, well, you just claimed liberals are socialists and now you're complaining they are wealthy, which is it?" You didn't just trap me. You trapped the liberals.
They advocate for wealth distribution. However, nobody claimed that liberals aren't giant hypocrites. So, for example, the same liberals who are socialists happen to be extremely wealthy. If I point that out, you might say "oh, well, you just claimed liberals are socialists and now you're complaining they are wealthy, which is it?" You didn't just trap me. You trapped the liberals.
I think you trapped me because I have no idea what you just said!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Have a great night.
