Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL, all the liberals who say that the elderly and children can't work. They're like "I just checked my liberal handbook and it says that you can only work between the ages of 35 and 50."
So YOU are saying that under 35 = children, and over 50 = elderly.
Wow, we are learning so much about your imaginary world this week.
So YOU are saying that under 35 = children, and over 50 = elderly.
Wow, we are learning so much about your imaginary world this week.
LMAO, you're trying to bust on me while liberals actually say that a 26 year old is still a "child" for insurance purposes and they have people retire in their 50s? I just got you to laugh at liberals, ftw.
Oh I didn't know that. They don't need to budget? who knew?
If you decided to lower their allowance, I have no problem with that. I'd still stick to my previous point, you cannot get rid of food stamps 100% and cracking down on fraud is more productive than telling people what not to buy.
There should be NO double-dipping, triple-dipping or more, of free food welfare program benefits for the exact same meals. No wonder Food Stamp recipients are disproportionately obese, even when compared to the income-eligible poor who CHOOSE to not receive Food Stamps.
There should be NO double-dipping, triple-dipping or more, of free food welfare program benefits for the exact same meals. No wonder Food Stamp recipients are disproportionately obese, even when compared to the income-eligible poor who CHOOSE to not receive Food Stamps.
I agree with the No double-dipping part.
The "obese" part, lol I didn't really pay attention to the food stamp recipients body shape. Matter of fact, I don't know anybody who receive food stamps. I will have to google it.
How many here are against food stamps being used to purchase junk food but were outraged about Michelle Obama's efforts to get healthy lunches, that are federally funded, into our schools?
How many here are against food stamps being used to purchase junk food but were outraged about Michelle Obama's efforts to get healthy lunches, that are federally funded, into our schools?
Who here would support forcing people on food stamps to eat Michelle Obama's lunches?
How many here are against food stamps being used to purchase junk food but were outraged about Michelle Obama's efforts to get healthy lunches, that are federally funded, into our schools?
I hope more people answer your question.
I am not against food stamps being used to purchase junk food, I am for cracking down on fraud. I also agree with NO double-dipping, triple-dipping or more like the other poster suggested.
I am against Obama's efforts to get healthy lunches, that are federally funded, into our schools. I think parents should pack lunches for their children. This is just my opinion.
I am against Obama's efforts to get healthy lunches, that are federally funded, into our schools. I think parents should pack lunches for their children. This is just my opinion.
BTW, did you know that many school districts now make it ILLEGAL for you to pack your child's lunch? They say that the parents won't feed their children appropriately, so they don't allow it. That's liberalism.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.