Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2016, 06:37 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,633,091 times
Reputation: 9169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
lol you have absolutely no proof that absent govt schools over half the population wouldn't educate its children.
And how many children are actually educated in govt schools? This is not to be confused with attending one.
Hardy har har, considering that half the population of this country makes less than $27k/yr, how do you fit $15k/yr for private school tuition in that budget? I make $52k/yr and would not be able to afford private school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-13-2016, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,792,370 times
Reputation: 20675
In the 70's Manitoba experimented with a temporary guaranteed income scheme funded by the providence and the federal government. Recipients were randomly selected from rural areas whereby recipients recieved a cash bonus of .35, .50 or .70 for every dollar earned. The experiment ceased when it ran out of money.

The Ontario scheme was originally intended to temporarily replace Ontario's works Program and Disability.
It morphed into something bigger in an attempt to remove stigmas associated with welfare. The federal government is not subsidizing the initiative.

Speculation on my part the experiment will come to a halt when Ontario runs out of funding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,792,370 times
Reputation: 20675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Why on Earth would I get a job if I can make $8.25/hr sitting at home playing on my iPad? Is basic income eligibility determined by family income or household income? If it's just family income that would be a huge disincentive to get married.
According to this source, it would indeed penalize marriage.


https://www.ontario.ca/form/basic-in...-public-survey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:05 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,646,990 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Hardy har har, considering that half the population of this country makes less than $27k/yr, how do you fit $15k/yr for private school tuition in that budget? I make $52k/yr and would not be able to afford private school.
Maybe you could with a voucher system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:18 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,371 posts, read 47,120,861 times
Reputation: 34108
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Have you ever thought that most people would spend or invest that money? So the economy would improve to where more tax revenue would be collected, therefore rates wouldn't have to be jacked too severely
You just stated it won't be enough to live on, then you state it will be invested. Which line are you taking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:21 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,371 posts, read 47,120,861 times
Reputation: 34108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
lol you have absolutely no proof that absent govt schools over half the population wouldn't educate its children.
And how many children are actually educated in govt schools? This is not to be confused with attending one.
100% correct and the grades reflect it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:29 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,128 posts, read 16,183,823 times
Reputation: 28337
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
First off, I think it is individual, and is not means tested, it is unconditional. Second, good luck affording a place to live and your other expenses with that money if you don't work. I would still work, that would only cover my rent and car payment
Didn't read the article, eh?
Quote:
Hugh Segal, a Conservative political strategist and long-time supporter of the idea, informed that adults between the ages of 18 to 65, who are living below the poverty line in Ontario, will get a basic income of at least $1,320 per month. Disabled citizens will receive $500 more. The basic income will be provided for three years.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,302 posts, read 2,359,117 times
Reputation: 1230
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Hardy har har, considering that half the population of this country makes less than $27k/yr, how do you fit $15k/yr for private school tuition in that budget? I make $52k/yr and would not be able to afford private school.
You're also assuming that private tuition in a free economy would be the same as it is now when the state essentially has a monopoly on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:35 AM
 
1,478 posts, read 789,987 times
Reputation: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
https://thebossmagazine.com/canada-u...c-income-plan/

Good news in my opinion. The amount is $1,320 a month. A not unreasonable amount. I love seeing trials like this, it is the kind of basic research in this that we need.

And make no mistake, massive technological unemployment is coming.
From article:

Quote:
The Details about the Universal Basic Income Pilot

Hugh Segal, a Conservative political strategist and long-time supporter of the idea, informed that adults between the ages of 18 to 65, who are living below the poverty line in Ontario, will get a basic income of at least $1,320 per month. Disabled citizens will receive $500 more. The basic income will be provided for three years.
And this is happening in a province of Canada or what if I am correct is the equivalent of a state in the USA. Or say, like the state of California, in which metro LA alone has a GDP roughly equal that of the entire wealthy nation of Netherlands.

I applaud this move by the province of Ontario in Canada and Canada itself. They are not waiting to see what LA or Chicago or New York City does or even the Federal Government of the USA but rather moving, or at least experimenting, with a truly progressive concept to positively impact what amount to millions of Canadian lives I suspect.

It is clear to them I suspect that the US nor LA are some shining city upon a hill.

Pimps operate by their mouths, the "game" they "spit" from their lips. So, big corporate America, the evangelists of the free market with no government help, why then do you call upon Daddy Government through your lobbyists to spent billions of US tax payer money to welfare finance an intervention, military or political, for you to enter Central Asia and even (you hope) Russia to start drilling for oil or mining for minerals in those regions? Why not simply rely only on the free market and fair competition rather than needing to wage a government financed propaganda war against other nations politicians?

Apparently the "trickle down effect" (economically) does not work out so well when operating like an empire. The money actually sprints upward rather than trickles down. Ontario is experimenting with waging its own war, a Christian based war, but not in killing people but a war against death, deprivation, and despair in the material realms.

Blessed be Canada and their flag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2016, 07:38 AM
 
Location: USA
18,504 posts, read 9,179,531 times
Reputation: 8536
Sounds like a shell game.

UBI is basically "negative taxation", paid for by taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top