Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-21-2016, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,288 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

I have to hand it to Texas, they don't give up easily. Still quoting the undercover video from the case they already lost in court.

So what's the plan for the 11,000 people who no longer have care, Planned Parenthood should just walk away and watch the disaster.


Quote:
In a critical step in a longstanding fight, Texas formally said on Tuesday that it was ending Medicaid funding of Planned Parenthood, a move the group said could affect 11,000 patients.
The office of inspector general for the Texas Health and Human Services Commission issued a final notice terminating Planned Parenthood’s enrollment in the state-funded health care system for the poor. If it is not stopped, the termination will be effective in 30 days.

In a statement on Tuesday night, the office of Gov. Greg Abbott said, “Texans expect that when taxpayer dollars are granted to health care providers, it is only to those who demonstrate that the health and safety of their patients come before a profit motive that puts women at greater risk.”
The termination notice, signed by the inspector general, Stuart W. Bowen Jr., cited violations that found Planned Parenthood was unqualified to provide medical services “in a professionally competent, safe, legal and ethical manner.”
The notice cited “extensive undercover video” obtained from a Planned Parenthood center in April 2015. The secretly recorded videos purported to show officials trying to illegally profit from the sale of aborted fetal tissue and discussing the issue with abortion opponents who posed as representatives of a biomedical firm. Planned Parenthood has said that the videos were deceptively edited and that the group did nothing illegal or unethical.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/20/us...T.nav=top-news
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2016, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Long Island
8,840 posts, read 4,805,229 times
Reputation: 6479
Obama blocked this, right? Are they heading to court again? Great use of their state's resources.

Obama Moves To Protect Planned Parenthood Funding : Shots - Health News : NPR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2016, 10:50 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892
I'm sure PP will file an appeal - they have 15 days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2016, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I have to hand it to Texas, they don't give up easily. Still quoting the undercover video from the case they already lost in court.

So what's the plan for the 11,000 people who no longer have care, Planned Parenthood should just walk away and watch the disaster.




http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/20/us...T.nav=top-news
Those people will just go elsewhere for care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2016, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,288 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Obama blocked this, right? Are they heading to court again? Great use of their state's resources.

Obama Moves To Protect Planned Parenthood Funding : Shots - Health News : NPR

No, this just has to do with just Texas no longer providing funding to PP at the state level. Obama is attempting to protect PP Title X funding at the Federal Level, congress has threatened to block just their funding. Title X funding was a put in place during the Nixon administration to provide health care for low income people, PP accounts for around a third of the funding. I don't see how you just remove funding for PP but not the other clinics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Those people will just go elsewhere for care.
So what problem have they solved, are the other clinics prepared to provide care for 11,000? What is their basis for removing a perfectly qualified provider. So much time and effort wasted and they are playing games with peoples lives who can ill afford to be inconvenienced.


Hard to believe they are still using a video to make their case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top