Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline."
Trump obeyed the LAW! The Seattle judge did not. I have to wonder, is the judge even familiar with this part of the United States Code? It would appear not. I imagine he will get educated sooner or later...
I guess you stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. So case closed folks, the guy who shoveled pig crap all his life and posts on City Data figured out what a federal judge couldn't. No more to see, case closed.
I'm very pleased to hear about the court ruling and looking forward to similar rulings blocking many more things Trump is planning to do. They will fight him tooth and nail on every outrageous thing he tries to do for the next four years. They will leave no stone unturned in utilizing every legal maneuver available to block, delay, or diminish his actions. The less damage this bull in a china shop is allowed to do, the better. If that means using guerilla style legal tactics, so be it.
YES.
Unlike the right, we don't need "2nd Amendment Remedies". We have the actual constitution to stand upon until Trump tried to declare Martial Law or whatever Bannon's next crazy step it.
Ideally, Trump supporters would grow a brain. But that's unlikely to happen. A certain percentage of people are naturally (brain wired that way) "Authoritarians" in that they suspend what they may know as "right" for the comfort of having someone else think for them.
Not So-Called....He is your President...let me help you...PRESIDENT TRUMP!
Well, you see, Trump called the judge in this case a "so-called" judge." Here is the tweet:
"The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!."
So that must be the proper protocol when you disagree with someone--you attempt to de-legitimize the person you disagree with. Trump should know all about this, as he did this very thing to his predecessor in the White House. It seems very fitting that we apply that same standard to our so-called president.
What exactly did Trump find, was there a specific terrorist activity that spurred this radical action?
The president has broad powers to address immediate threats, maybe Trump knows something that suddenly happened that even his closest advisors such as Kelly and Mattis were unaware.
He believed that the unlimited entry of a certain class of peoples from certain countries constituted a threat to the United States.
The LAW gives him the authority to stop such immigration.
He did that, for a specified limited period, as the LAW requires.
As for specific terrorist activity, how about the Boston bombers, the San Bernardino shooters, and possibly some others that I can't think of right at the moment
ok liberals are so hypocrites.....when judges ruled against Obama or the liberal agenda they go after the judges.
Obama did it.....and so do many democrats when judges orders or stay doesn't go their way.....but when Trump does it then he is undermining the constitution and seperation of power....what a joke!
Trump has every right to disagree with the judge just like Obama and every Democrat has done.......if you don't like a judge ruling, you appeal it like Obama and Democrats have done.
Not sure the tide is turning, but at least in this one instance, sanity seems to have taken hold.
This was a poorly thought out, poorly written EO that obviously was not even run by a legal team, let alone the departments that were involved.
Trump ordered a travel ban on Iraq without bothering to consult the Sec. of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or even the Director of National Intelligence. Since they are actually running a war in Iraq, one would think that at least giving them a heads up, if not actually consulting with them, would have been a smart move.
Fingers crossed here.
At this point things will either end up peacefully or in blood. The peaceful resolution is impeachment. The bloody one is a crackdown of protests and resistance by the federal government. Either a very real possibility.
Not sure the tide is turning, but at least in this one instance, sanity seems to have taken hold.
This was a poorly thought out, poorly written EO that obviously was not even run by a legal team, let alone the departments that were involved.
Trump ordered a travel ban on Iraq without bothering to consult the Sec. of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or even the Director of National Intelligence. Since they are actually running a war in Iraq, one would think that at least giving them a heads up, if not actually consulting with them, would have been a smart move.
Fingers crossed here.
I just hope Trump learned his lesson here. Based on his tweets, it seems he hasn't.
Lol...there's nothing better that libs who suddenly rediscover the constitution or concepts like separation of powers. Where were you silly people the last eight years? Oh really, never mind.
ok liberals are so hypocrites.....when judges ruled against Obama or the liberal agenda they go after the judges.
Obama did it.....and so do many democrats when judges orders or stay doesn't go their way.....but when Trump does it then he is undermining the constitution and seperation of power....what a joke!
Trump has every right to disagree with the judge just like Obama and every Democrat has done.......if you don't like a judge ruling, you appeal it like Obama and Democrats have done.
hypocrites!
I thought your candidate is better than Obama. Then why do the same things as you claim?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
