Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2017, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,122,988 times
Reputation: 1644

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
Electricity from solar and wind is great...unless you like having electricity on nights with no wind. During those times, you need power from conventional sources like coal, gas, nuclear, and hydro.
Ever heard of a company called Tesla?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2017, 05:52 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
I'm a professional engineer with 37 years of experience in the electric utility industry. I also was qualified chief engineer for naval nuclear propulsion plants. Does that make me a "self proclaimed" expert in your mind?
That's scary. You sure it isn't Verizon?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MShv_74FNWU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 05:52 PM
 
Location: USA
18,499 posts, read 9,164,949 times
Reputation: 8529
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
The full cost of solar and wind are less than the fuel cost of these fossil units. Easy peasy.
That's true in Hawaii.

If that were true on the mainland, solar and wind would not need generous subsidies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 05:54 PM
 
Location: USA
18,499 posts, read 9,164,949 times
Reputation: 8529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
Ever heard of a company called Tesla?
I have. What's your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,801,130 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Somebody on here that worked in the electric generation industry busted that myth in another thread.
Coal is much cheaper than these other fuels.
Coal is only cheaper when the wind is not blowing.

So many windfarms have been built in North Dakota that the problem is there are not enough transmission lines to send the electrical energy to places like the Twin Cities and Chicago without shutting off coal plants.

Yes the coal plants for now have to be kept, however that is just until excess energy produced by the wind can be stored in pumped hydroelectric facilities like Ludington.

All those windmills represent payments to workers to build them and maintain them and revenue for farmers to rent the space.

North Dakota alone has enough potential wind energy to eliminate many coal jobs.

However, net jobs goes up. Net income goes up. CO2 goes down.

There is one and only one reason the GOP refuse to see this and call wind generation bad. They are taking money.


Spend a second to read about pumped storage of electrical energy. The Great Lakes and other big reservoirs can easily store energy from wind farms so coal can be eliminated altogether.

These pumped storage facilities will also create many more jobs.

see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludi...ge_Power_Plant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:07 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Better than the asthma cause by coal fired plants.

'
Asthma rates have increased while the 6 most common air pollutants as an aggregate have been reduced by about 64% since the 80's, call me crazy but I think you need to look elsewhere. I would suggest it's indoor air quality with 3 factors.

  1. Insulation, Tyvek, air tight windows.... While these things have lead to increased efficiency they also trap indoor air pollutants.
  2. The way we heat homes and buildings has shifted from hydronic heating systems to ducted heating. These systems can harbor and distribute the "nasties" throughout the air in a house or building. If you have a weak stomach probably not a good idea to click this link.
  3. People and kids in particular spend a great deal more time indoors. They aren't out riding their bikes in the fresh air but sitting at home in what has become a polluted environment.


Rational and reasoned arguments, not hyperbole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:09 PM
 
29,537 posts, read 19,626,354 times
Reputation: 4549
Yes coal is sooooo dead..

https://twitter.com/dmisic/status/715623837547773954
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:11 PM
 
29,537 posts, read 19,626,354 times
Reputation: 4549
How about US electricity generation?

https://twitter.com/OECD/status/583758967849033728
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,122,988 times
Reputation: 1644
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
It's rapidly dying though.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 06:13 PM
 
Location: USA
18,499 posts, read 9,164,949 times
Reputation: 8529
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise View Post
Coal is only cheaper when the wind is not blowing.

So many windfarms have been built in North Dakota that the problem is there are not enough transmission lines to send the electrical energy to places like the Twin Cities and Chicago without shutting off coal plants.

Yes the coal plants for now have to be kept, however that is just until excess energy produced by the wind can be stored in pumped hydroelectric facilities like Ludington.

All those windmills represent payments to workers to build them and maintain them and revenue for farmers to rent the space.

North Dakota alone has enough potential wind energy to eliminate many coal jobs.

However, net jobs goes up. Net income goes up. CO2 goes down.

There is one and only one reason the GOP refuse to see this and call wind generation bad. They are taking money.


Spend a second to read about pumped storage of electrical energy. The Great Lakes and other big reservoirs can easily store energy from wind farms so coal can be eliminated altogether.

These pumped storage facilities will also create many more jobs.

see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludi...ge_Power_Plant
Pumped storage is awesome.

Unfortunately, we'd need a huge amount of it to eliminate the need for conventional backup power plants.

https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/11/pump-up-the-storage/

We would need something on the order of 10,000 large pumped storage facilities in order to have a 7 day power supply for the USA. If we think 7 days of storage is not necessary, even one day of storage is still 1400 large pumped storage facilities.

Last edited by Freak80; 06-04-2017 at 06:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top