Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:18 AM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,899,690 times
Reputation: 2460

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
So when it was said that whatever it was, 40 million people had no insurance, that wasn't a problem?

Those who could not afford insurance either went sick or went to ER's where others paid for them.
Basics for Healthcare.


Control cost of service.
fair price for drugs
bidding across state lines (Like Care Insurance)
Tort reform A concerted effort to reduce mal practice issues.
(There is always a risk to at treatment)
Tax rebates for employers who provide ins.
All a good start!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:18 AM
 
36,760 posts, read 31,015,711 times
Reputation: 33074
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
So when it was said that whatever it was, 40 million people had no insurance, that wasn't a problem?

Those who could not afford insurance either went sick or went to ER's where others paid for them.
Why did they have no insurance? Employer didn't offer, couldn't afford, didn't qualify for the various other government assisted medical, didn't want it?

So was it an epidemic, where was the big problem? I recall reading where several major hospitals had to shut down due to illegals swamping the ERs, never to be found again for billing? But otherwise I was unaware citizens being uninsured was a problem, perhaps I missed it and you can provide some information.

And yet People still go to the ER where others pay for it and now we are paying more for it on top of that.
Here's a story on how messed up the system is now. When my gkids were left with me they had TNcare. One got pretty sick for 3 days so I finally called around to get him to a clinic. I called three clinics and my doctors office and none accepted his TNcare. I explained the situation and said I would pay for the visit but was told they could not make an appointment or treat him because me paying the bill out of pocket was considered fraud. I had to go to the ER so a 65 dollar office visit cost the taxpayers 600$.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:20 AM
 
36,760 posts, read 31,015,711 times
Reputation: 33074
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
Basics for Healthcare.


Control cost of service.
fair price for drugs
bidding across state lines (Like Care Insurance)
Tort reform A concerted effort to reduce mal practice issues.
(There is always a risk to at treatment)
Tax rebates for employers who provide ins.
All a good start!
exactly. Tackle the problem where the problem starts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,410 posts, read 26,366,976 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
How did it work all those years prior to mandatory membership?
You do realize many still have no health coverage. Its only mandatory payments, not membership, if you don't qualify for free coverage.
Well without penalties for people who refuse to enroll in health care how does any system function or are we just going back to pre-ACA. They said they wanted to keep the requirement for preexisting conditions, who's going to pay for that. How will they continue to fund all those old and unhealthy people enrolled in the ACA without mandatory insurance or fines.


Yes some do not have health coverage but the ACA covered many who did not previously have health insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:48 AM
 
36,760 posts, read 31,015,711 times
Reputation: 33074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well without penalties for people who refuse to enroll in health care how does any system function or are we just going back to pre-ACA. They said they wanted to keep the requirement for preexisting conditions, who's going to pay for that. How will they continue to fund all those old and unhealthy people enrolled in the ACA without mandatory insurance or fines.


Yes some do not have health coverage but the ACA covered many who did not previously have health insurance.
How do the penalties help the system function. You have people who are still uninsured but now they pay a penalty. You also have people who do have private health insurance but its not approved so they are also paying penalties. You have people who joined and are paying high premiums for coverage they dont need or want. And you have people getting coverage that contribute nothing. How exactly does that system work. It doesnt.
Yes pre ACA. Please.

You can put in place a mandate or program to ensure those with pre-existing conditions receive affordable coverage without all the other BS.
All those old unhealthy people can receive medicare like before, low income, medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:08 AM
 
8,175 posts, read 3,724,400 times
Reputation: 2756
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
How do the penalties help the system function. You have people who are still uninsured but now they pay a penalty. You also have people who do have private health insurance but its not approved so they are also paying penalties. You have people who joined and are paying high premiums for coverage they dont need or want. And you have people getting coverage that contribute nothing. How exactly does that system work. It doesnt.
Yes pre ACA. Please.

You can put in place a mandate or program to ensure those with pre-existing conditions receive affordable coverage without all the other BS.
All those old unhealthy people can receive medicare like before, low income, medicaid.
And how do you propose to achieve that. Before ACA nothing preexisting was covered on the individual market.


The penalties did not quite work because they did not ramp them quickly enough. So , in a way many people decided to go uninsured and pay the relatively minor penalty. The "unapproved" insurance typically does not cover anything so I'm all for it to stay unapproved. And , the only way to keep the system solvent is for healthy people who "don't need or want coverage" to pay into the system. Otherwise, most will wait to get sick and seek treatment then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:09 AM
 
8,175 posts, read 3,724,400 times
Reputation: 2756
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
Basics for Healthcare.


Control cost of service.
fair price for drugs
bidding across state lines (Like Care Insurance)
Tort reform A concerted effort to reduce mal practice issues.
(There is always a risk to at treatment)
Tax rebates for employers who provide ins.
All a good start!

I'm all for cost control but you need government for that (you know, like in alll other countries). Are you ok with that?

Btw, the tort reform was passed ages ago in Texas, didn't do anything in terms of cost control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Amongst the AZ Cactus
7,068 posts, read 6,490,335 times
Reputation: 7730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Yes, congratulations, you are free to mooch your healthcare off the backs of other people again.
No, the medicaid extension piece of obamacare used by many states wasn't repealed yet so the "mooching" you speak of continues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
1,187 posts, read 1,025,989 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well without penalties for people who refuse to enroll in health care how does any system function or are we just going back to pre-ACA. They said they wanted to keep the requirement for preexisting conditions, who's going to pay for that. How will they continue to fund all those old and unhealthy people enrolled in the ACA without mandatory insurance or fines.


Yes some do not have health coverage but the ACA covered many who did not previously have health insurance.
I think there is a penalty for people with company healthcare plan. I never understood why? But our salaries are adjusted little bit as soon as Obamacare went into a law. Any reason why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:42 AM
 
36,760 posts, read 31,015,711 times
Reputation: 33074
[quote=serger;47229436]
Quote:
And how do you propose to achieve that. Before ACA nothing preexisting was covered on the individual market.
If an administration can implement ACA, they can implement pre-existing coverage.


Quote:
The penalties did not quite work because they did not ramp them quickly enough. So , in a way many people decided to go uninsured and pay the relatively minor penalty. The "unapproved" insurance typically does not cover anything so I'm all for it to stay unapproved. And , the only way to keep the system solvent is for healthy people who "don't need or want coverage" to pay into the system. Otherwise, most will wait to get sick and seek treatment then.
Yes the unapproved insurance does. Why must everyone have the same coverage? I'm well beyond childbearing, why do I need maternity and birth control coverage. What if I just need catastrophic insurance coverage? A co-worker and her husband have private family health coverage tailored to fit their needs but for whatever it is not approved by OBC so they not only pay monthly premiums but about $1,000 fine yearly. How is it you or anyone else can make a decision on what someone else insurance covers or what is right for them.

Why do we need a system and why should healthy people who don't need or want coverage they offered pay into the system to cover other peoples health care for free? We already had programs to assist the poor with health coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top