Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-06-2017, 04:40 AM
 
26,637 posts, read 15,195,538 times
Reputation: 14769

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Nixon wasn't divisive. He was a crook.

Obama wasn't divisive. He just made bigots more bigoted than they already were.

I saw it several times myself personally.


It is not divisive to bash the police before evidence comes in, bash Bush for things and then out-Bush Bush on those things, to exclude the opposite party on the formation of major legislation and then claim you wanted bi-partisan support.

And then if the rumor is true that he plated land mines for Trump, you would insist that was harmonious?

The other poster referenced Nixon as the standard for divisiveness.

You are a deep thinker.

Last edited by michiganmoon; 03-06-2017 at 05:37 AM..

 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:29 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,409 posts, read 26,387,728 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yep. We already know Clapper lied about it this past weekend. Not the first time Clapper lied to Congress and/or the public. Seems Comey lied about this, as well.
Neither the FBI, CIA, Tom Cotton or Nunes are aware of any request to wiretap Trump, are they all lying. Trump could add some details to this whopper but instead headed out to the golf course after claiming this was worse than Watergate.
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Self explanatory
12,601 posts, read 7,258,137 times
Reputation: 16799
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Who said we believe one way or another. People with common sense wait for evidence. Unlike people in melt down mode who don't need evidence before they convict.
You mean like Trump, and his accusations?
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:38 AM
 
59,428 posts, read 27,577,910 times
Reputation: 14379
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash View Post
LMAO!!!



If you are DJT you do. Its your standard modus operandi.

And he has complete confidence his lemmings and cult worshipers will believe him and blame ALL his troubles on Obama.Which is the only reason he says stuff like this. He knows its not true and that normal people wont believe him, but his lies are not aimed at normal thinking Americans, but at his followers.
"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside
You don't make accusations of this nature without some kind of proof.



"LMAO!!!"



"If you are DJT you do. Its your standard modus operandi."

This all started with the ACCUSATIONS That Trump and his campaign "colluded" with the Russians during the election.

The LEFT MADE all these accusations with NO evidence to back it up.

NOT 1 SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE HAS BEEN BROUGHT FORTH confirming this accusation.

Clapper, Comey etc, have SAID that they have found NOTHING.

Yet, we read on her all the childish remarks about Trump and Putin including comrade, etc.

So BEFORE you get your panties in a wad about Trump, you might want to look into into a mirror.

Your side started this mess so where is YOUR evidence to support the Trump Russian accusations?
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:42 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,358,691 times
Reputation: 8066
Here's an interesting point of view - "One thing that does occur to me is that it’s a way to not only get the heat off Sessions, but to show the opposition that if you want to play the innuendo game, then two can play at this game."

neo-neocon » Blog Archive » Trump charges that Obama tried to wiretap Trump Tower

It's a quick read.
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:47 AM
 
59,428 posts, read 27,577,910 times
Reputation: 14379
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
"Baffling as it may be, it appears Trump’s accusation stems from a recent article published on Breitbart."

Lot of people view this as rather odd, including Cato Institute fellow Julian Sanchez, since the POTUS "doesn’t need to get his information about classified activity from Breitbart."

https://www.wired.com/2017/03/feds-w...t-obama-worry/

This is a serious claim and Trump needs to produce the evidence to back it up.

While we are all holding our breath waiting for that to happen, perhaps Congress could insist on it.

At the very least, one of the committees should be looking into what the FISA requests were all about.
"This is a serious claim and Trump needs to produce the evidence to back it up."

I agree and the left needs to provide the evidence to back up ITS claims about the Trump and Russian "collusion" they have been claiming all this time.

"What is good for the goose, IS GOOD for the gander" !
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:53 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,368 posts, read 45,100,927 times
Reputation: 13814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Neither the FBI, CIA, Tom Cotton or Nunes are aware of any request to wiretap Trump, are they all lying.
Ask the NY Times. They reported that the Trump campaign was wiretapped and transcripts were reported to the WH.
 
Old 03-06-2017, 05:57 AM
 
59,428 posts, read 27,577,910 times
Reputation: 14379
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Exactly.

An independent prosecutor leading a full investigation would be just the ticket.

We need to get to the bottom of this so we can move on.
"An independent prosecutor"

Do you really think there is 1?

Judge Starr was ACCUSED of all sorts of things.

Fitzpatrick was Shumer cronie.

In today's political climate I don't think we could find ANYBODY BOTH sides would agree on.

On top of that things like this, when turned over to a Special Persecutor takes YEARS.

We know you would like it drawn out so you, and your side, could continue with the accusations KNOWING that the info will NOT be released UNTIL the investigation is over.

Fitzpatrick took 2 YEARS and knew going in who had first "outed" Valerie Plame yet, he continued and in the end NO ONE was charged with outing her.
 
Old 03-06-2017, 06:00 AM
 
59,428 posts, read 27,577,910 times
Reputation: 14379
Quote:
Originally Posted by skins_fan82 View Post
Of all the times Donald Trump has embarrassed himself, this false wiretap accusation is going to come with some real consequences.
You and your will be MORE embarrassed then when you made ALL those predictions that Trump didn't have a snowballs chance in hell of WINING the election and Hillary would be our next president.

When is she going to be inaugurated?

Your sides history or predictions is horrendous!
 
Old 03-06-2017, 06:01 AM
 
59,428 posts, read 27,577,910 times
Reputation: 14379
Quote:
Originally Posted by ritholtz View Post
Flynn resigned. We are yet to see any case filed against him. FBI yet to disclose his exact communication with Russians.
"We are yet to see any case filed against him"

And we WON'T!

He was fired for NOT telling Pence, NOT what he did.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top