Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

"The Trump administration wants to build a 30-foot-high border wall that looks good from the north side and is difficult to climb or cut through, according to a pair of contract notices posted to a government website... The proposals are due to the government by March 29."

"The government will award a contract based on 30-foot-wide sample walls that are to be built in San Diego."

The gov't is one step closer to building the border wall. It's now accepting designs. | Circa News - Learn. Think. Do.

These are the requirements for the design proposals:

1) Proposals for both a solid concrete wall or for a see-through structure.
2) The wall must be sunk at least six feet into the ground
3) Must include 25-foot and 50-foot automated gates for pedestrians and vehicles.
4) Must take at least one hour to cut through it with: sledgehammer, car jack, pick axe, chisel, battery operated impact tools, battery operated cutting tools, Oxy/acetylene torch or other similar hand-held tools.

How many proposals do you think the White House will get and will any of them come from Mexico?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:18 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,966,636 times
Reputation: 9227
Just so you know, a fair number of us will never click those weirdo websites you guys link to. Try to find a more reputable source.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:26 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Contrary to Trump, the Pesos aren't northbound.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:30 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,621,539 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Contrary to Trump, the Pesos aren't northbound.
But less dollars could go southbound.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:33 AM
 
Location: NYC
5,251 posts, read 3,610,760 times
Reputation: 15957
The poor mooks who voted for him are going to watch all of their tax money spent on this debacle & defense dept increases while their health insurance, unemployment, taxes, social security, medicare, schools just start circling the drain. Just look at his proposed budget - great for the $250K/yr crowd.

Mexico will pay? Just watch.... YOU are going to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:45 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
But less dollars could go southbound.

That's not wht he promised, is it?

I hear the story we'll get reimbursed by tariffs and charging Mexicans higher visa fees to visit the US, but when Mexico responds in kind, just how will they be paying for the wall as promised?

Sounds like more unsubstantiated BS to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,026,245 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Just so you know, a fair number of us will never click those weirdo websites you guys link to. Try to find a more reputable source.
The design proposal notices have already been made public late Friday by Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security Department agency that will oversee the project and eventually patrol and maintain the wall. The website that is "scaring" you just took the info from the Customs and Border Protection website's PRESS RELEASES here:

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/nationa...all-prototypes

I'd be more concerned about The Washington Post and their flock of unnamed sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Central Mexico and Central Florida
7,150 posts, read 4,906,179 times
Reputation: 10444
All he has in next two year budgets is under $4 billion; the estimated cost is $25 billion. And Congress isn't willing to commit to that, not now, likely not ever. More Americans reject the wall than support it.

More importantly GOP senators from farm states oppose the wall, as do GOP senators from states that have done well under NAFTA. Not to mention the GOP senators with brains in their heads who also oppose this ridiculous idea.

They will let the little man-child have a few billion just to make him happy; that $4 billion will be spent on eminent domain and engineering studies....all money out the window since it'll never be built.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.c80f050c09fa
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,467,310 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Contrary To MSM Reporting The Wall Is Going Forth
I haven't heard any MSM reports that the wall isn't going forward.
Funding it in Congress is the main challenge. Granny may have to do with less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 01:52 PM
 
62,970 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hefe View Post
The poor mooks who voted for him are going to watch all of their tax money spent on this debacle & defense dept increases while their health insurance, unemployment, taxes, social security, medicare, schools just start circling the drain. Just look at his proposed budget - great for the $250K/yr crowd.

Mexico will pay? Just watch.... YOU are going to pay.

I'd rather pay for a $25 billion wall than the $113 billion a year that illegals cost us and would continue to rise with more of them coming here. Not to mention the loss of jobs, reduced wages, more depletion of our natural and social resources, overcrowded schools, jails, hospitals, roads and neighborhoods and increased crime from illegal immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top