Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2016, 12:02 PM
 
207 posts, read 113,196 times
Reputation: 198

Advertisements

Yesterday on am640 talk radio York U professor Julio Fonseca said, "there's nothing negative about Fidel Castro." Wow! Is left wing liberal academia that blind and biased!? First our PM and now this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2016, 01:50 PM
 
2,829 posts, read 3,175,858 times
Reputation: 2266
And I say: President-elect Donald Trump looks like a pumpkin and drowns kittens on his spare time.

It's called a personal opinion. Get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,376,569 times
Reputation: 23858
Meh.
Communism has failed. Castro was a living relic, and now he's a dead relic.

The one thing about the guy is the fact that his communist revolution was the only one that ever succeeded in Latin America and actually took root.
Chile, Guatemala, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela, Argentina and Columbia all had communist rebel movements in their time, and a couple of them were able to take over the government, but those that actually succeeded didn't ever last for more than a few years, and all the others never got anywhere. Only Castro was able to pull it off.

All the others either returned to democracy or went back to strong-man dictatorships. Castro was one of the rare breed, whose personal magnetism is so great it carries them through. Mao had it, too, but after he died, things in China changed forever. Those guys don't come along often enough to make any political movement stick after they die, and Cuba won't be any different.

To us, he was a bad threat, but his communism wasn't the threat- the Russian missiles were.

Once the missiles were gone, he was just a pain in the butt.

But for all the Cuban peasants who cut sugar cane under one corrupt strong-man dictator after another, Castro was another guy who ran the show. They still ended up chopping cane all their lives, but they got a little something more for it than they got under Battista.

Cuba and the United States have older and stronger ties than Castro was able to ever eradicate. Now that he's gone, it's only a matter of time before those ties will become strong again, but for sure, neither nation will ever return to the old relationship as it once was.

I expect a lot of Cuban Americans are real busy right now, making plans that will build fortunes for them once they return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,620,010 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonkid123 View Post
And I say: President-elect Donald Trump looks like a pumpkin and drowns kittens on his spare time.

It's called a personal opinion. Get over it.
Says someone who cannot get over the OP sharing his personal opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 08:05 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Meh.
Communism has failed. Castro was a living relic, and now he's a dead relic.

The one thing about the guy is the fact that his communist revolution was the only one that ever succeeded in Latin America and actually took root.
Chile, Guatemala, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela, Argentina and Columbia all had communist rebel movements in their time, and a couple of them were able to take over the government, but those that actually succeeded didn't ever last for more than a few years, and all the others never got anywhere. Only Castro was able to pull it off.

All the others either returned to democracy or went back to strong-man dictatorships. Castro was one of the rare breed, whose personal magnetism is so great it carries them through. Mao had it, too, but after he died, things in China changed forever. Those guys don't come along often enough to make any political movement stick after they die, and Cuba won't be any different.

To us, he was a bad threat, but his communism wasn't the threat- the Russian missiles were.

Once the missiles were gone, he was just a pain in the butt.

But for all the Cuban peasants who cut sugar cane under one corrupt strong-man dictator after another, Castro was another guy who ran the show. They still ended up chopping cane all their lives, but they got a little something more for it than they got under Battista.

Cuba and the United States have older and stronger ties than Castro was able to ever eradicate. Now that he's gone, it's only a matter of time before those ties will become strong again, but for sure, neither nation will ever return to the old relationship as it once was.

I expect a lot of Cuban Americans are real busy right now, making plans that will build fortunes for them once they return.
No mention of executing people who not only disagreed with him but even those who agreed with him but might be a threat to his dominance?

I'm sorry, but when thousands of your people are hopping on rafts made of garbage each year to escape, it can't be rainbows and lollipops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2016, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,710 posts, read 21,070,199 times
Reputation: 14257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turthist View Post
Yesterday on am640 talk radio York U professor Julio Fonseca said, "there's nothing negative about Fidel Castro." Wow! Is left wing liberal academia that blind and biased!? First our PM and now this!
Some people say things to incite a combative conversation... Radio people the worse.. I do not like them at all, but have a right to Bla bla bla
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 11:58 PM
 
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
7,733 posts, read 6,468,122 times
Reputation: 10399
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonkid123 View Post
And I say: President-elect Donald Trump looks like a pumpkin and drowns kittens on his spare time.

It's called a personal opinion. Get over it.
But he actually does, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2017, 12:00 AM
 
Location: St. Louis Park, MN
7,733 posts, read 6,468,122 times
Reputation: 10399
Maybe he can ask my great grandparents or my great grandmother's uncle who was murdered violently by Castro's little fleas about all the great positivity Fidel Castro had to offer the Cuban people. If he gets a telescope and looks way up into the heavens, he can see my great grandma on her rocking chair, giving him the bird
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2017, 04:55 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
No mention of executing people who not only disagreed with him but even those who agreed with him but might be a threat to his dominance?

I'm sorry, but when thousands of your people are hopping on rafts made of garbage each year to escape, it can't be rainbows and lollipops.
In that case, Castro behaved no different than the leaders of your country who killed dissidents that didn't agree with their policies and who were assumed to be a threat to this country (even though they clearly weren't). That's even worse than killing your own citizens.

How many people did we kill in Guatemala or Indonesia alone? Or Vietnam? Chile? Iran? El Salvador? Iraq? Afghanistan?

Yeah...you get the picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2017, 05:33 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turthist View Post
Yesterday on am640 talk radio York U professor Julio Fonseca said, "there's nothing negative about Fidel Castro." Wow! Is left wing liberal academia that blind and biased!? First our PM and now this!
This guy does not represent all professors at universities. He is one person who was born and raised in Cuba and supports Castro.

That's like saying you represent all of us on this board because you post here.

You don't -- you don't even represent the majority being a Canadian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top