Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:33 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,910,517 times
Reputation: 4942

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
Yes, we have only a tiny fraction of what they have and we have had more people killed by Islamic Terrorist since 2000 than all of Europe combined. The Trumps, Le Pens and others are winning not because there is fear mongoring but because there is actually something to be afraid of. These guys arent screaming "Jesus Saves" or "Loves me some Budha" when they kill us
Please see my other reply.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
You have more to fear of random gun violence, being mugged, being killed by a bus/car as a pedestrian, being killed in an accident on the road, or even being struck by lightning.

The level of noise associated with terrorism fear and rhetoric doesn't match the statistical risk associated with being a target of a terrorist attack.

Notice, I'm not saying there is no risk - just that it is VERY low risk, and the attention payed to it is overblown.

These politicians largely know this...but fear is a powerful thing, especially fear of something that is hard to understand/relate to. And these politicians are exploiting that fear to their benefit.
There is of course something "there" - but is it enough of a threat to warrant this amount of attention that we're giving it as a world?

This is VERY obviously fear mongering. And the politicians are exploiting it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:38 PM
 
800 posts, read 508,600 times
Reputation: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
In Europe it is not just fear of terroris. Impoverished immigrants are straining the welfare state. Add higher crime rates and you have problems way beyond terrorism.

Immigration policy should not include a "duty" to take in reefugees. Policy should be based on what is best for a nation.
Completely right. Its not just a terrorism issue, but a HUGE financial and crime issue as well. As well as a cultural tension issue as many of these Islamic migrants aren't assimilating well at all. They're a FAR cry from "just more immigrants" like Italians in America a century ago. In Germany, only 5% of the Islamic migrants that arrived in 2015 have found employment by now. Having 95% of them on welfare is a huge problem. We should take in immigrants solely based on what positives they can add to our country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:38 PM
 
624 posts, read 370,795 times
Reputation: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUTGR View Post
I bet every American you know thinks Trump is an idiot, and yet he's President.
Our last President put us further in debt and won a nobel prize on the way out, and released plenty of terrorist within his 8 years that want to kill us and people tells us American's that Trump is idiot for securing America.
Trump didn't leave weapons of mass destruction in Iraq OBUMMER AND HILLARY DID
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:40 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,954,135 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
The world is wising up to the mental disorder known as liberalism. Having witnessed the damage that liberalism causes, the masses are turning towards whatever represents the opposite of liberalism. Sanity prevails


Amen!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:41 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,910,517 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
In Europe it is not just fear of terroris. Impoverished immigrants are straining the welfare state. Add higher crime rates and you have problems way beyond terrorism.

Immigration policy should not include a "duty" to take in reefugees. Policy should be based on what is best for a nation.
Yes, this is true. See my other reply regarding this false equivalency:

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
There was never a chance that we would see anywhere near the amount of refugees coming here than have gone to European countries. We're talking tens of thousands vs. millions.

And we're an enormous country used to immigrants by comparison. Total apples to oranges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:48 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,655 posts, read 28,682,916 times
Reputation: 50531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luvbostons7489 View Post
Our last President put us further in debt and won a nobel prize on the way out, and released plenty of terrorist within his 8 years that want to kill us and people tells us American's that Trump is idiot for securing America.
Trump didn't leave weapons of mass destruction in Iraq OBUMMER AND HILLARY DID
President OBAMA (correct spelling, lol) kept us safe. The president who started a war over faux weapons of mass destruction wash Bush #2--a terrible president, most agree.

We're all afraid of terrorism, member of both parties. We should be very careful of who is allowed to come to this country. But the ones who are whipping up the hysteria of fear right now are the Republicans--and right wingers around the world. That's how they think they can get elected.

BTW, people in the UK voted for BREXIT but that didn't include crazy stuff like giving up national health care, sacrificing the environment, and tax cuts for the wealthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:48 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,097,165 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
I hope history doesn't repeat itself. France isn't the Weimar Republic at this stage, so I hope they don't elect her and remain strong. Vichy France should stay buried where it belongs, in the past
Yes, continuing on a path that will lead Europe into cultural destruction, and complete instability is remaining strong.

You are correct, we could very well see history repeat itself.

We could see Europe plunged into a dark age, and there be a need for a new crusades to free the people of Europe from muslim oppression.

Last edited by stburr91; 04-21-2017 at 07:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:50 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
What's interesting about Le Pen and the Front National Party is that a lot of the youth support her .
Obviously it ain't just old white men sick of the status quo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,458,447 times
Reputation: 12318
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Obviously it ain't just old white men sick of the status quo.
Young folks in France actually seem to care about their country and they seem a lot more patriotic in general than in America .
Many young people in America seem like they'd rather be living in Europe and look down on America .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2017, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wambatown81 View Post
Completely right. Its not just a terrorism issue, but a HUGE financial and crime issue as well. As well as a cultural tension issue as many of these Islamic migrants aren't assimilating well at all. They're a FAR cry from "just more immigrants" like Italians in America a century ago. In Germany, only 5% of the Islamic migrants that arrived in 2015 have found employment by now. Having 95% of them on welfare is a huge problem. We should take in immigrants solely based on what positives they can add to our country.
A century ago we had no welfare state. We could take in them poor huddled masses. The only issue was wages and working conditions. With the emergence of the welfare state things got a lot more complicated but basically nations should not be importing the poor and unskilled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top